The effect of outpatient web-based online scheduling versus traditional staff scheduling systems on progression to surgery and no-show rates.

Background: This study aimed to compare the rate of scheduled surgery and no-show rates between online-scheduled appointments and traditionally scheduled appointments.

Materials And Methods: All scheduled outpatient visits at a single large multi-subspecialty orthopedic practice in three U.S. states (PA, NJ, and NY) were collected from February 1, 2022, to February 28, 2022. Visits were categorized as "online-scheduled" or "traditionally scheduled" and then further grouped as "no-show," "canceled," or "visited." Finally, visits were categorized as either "new patient" or "follow-up."

Results: There was no significant difference between scheduling systems for patient progression to any procedure within 3 months of the initial visit ( = 0.97) and patient progression for surgery only within 3 months of the initial visit ( = 0.88). However, we found a significant difference with a higher rate of progression to surgery in traditionally scheduled than online-scheduled visits when accounting for only new patient visits that progressed to surgery within 3 months of the initial encounter ( = 0.036). No-show rates between scheduling systems were not significant ( = 0.79), but no-show rates were significant when comparing the practice's subspecialties ( < 0.001). Finally, no-show rates for online-scheduled compared to traditionally scheduled patients for both new and follow-up appointments were not significantly different ( = 0.28 and = 0.94, respectively).

Conclusion: Orthopedic practices should utilize online-scheduling systems as there was a higher progression to surgery of traditionally scheduled appointments compared to online. Depending on the subspecialty, no-show rates differed. Furthermore, online-scheduling allows for more patient autonomy and less burden on office staff.