AI Article Synopsis

  • Nasopharyngeal RT-PCR testing is the standard method for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2, but it doesn't differentiate between active and resolved infections, necessitating alternative testing methods for better clinical guidance.
  • A study analyzed blood plasma nucleocapsid antigen in patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection to assess its potential as a biomarker for active infection while requiring both nasal and blood samples for accuracy.
  • The findings suggest that most patients with active infections show detectable antigen in blood, indicating the possibility of using blood tests as a convenient and sensitive alternative to nasal swabs for diagnosing ongoing SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Article Abstract

Background: Nasopharyngeal qualitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but it is not practical or sufficient in every clinical scenario due to its inability to distinguish active from resolved infection. Alternative or adjunct testing may be needed to guide isolation precautions and treatment in patients admitted to the hospital.

Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of residual clinical specimens and medical record data to examine blood plasma nucleocapsid antigen as a candidate biomarker of active SARS-CoV-2. Adult patients admitted to the hospital or presenting to the emergency department with SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid (RNA) detected by RT-PCR from a nasopharyngeal swab specimen were included. Both nasopharyngeal swab and a paired whole blood sample were required to be available for analysis.

Results: Fifty-four patients were included. Eight patients had positive nasopharyngeal swab virus cultures, 7 of whom (87.5%) had concurrent antigenemia. Nineteen (79.2%) of 24 patients with detectable subgenomic RNA and 20 (80.0%) of 25 patients with N2 RT-PCR cycle threshold ≤ 33 had antigenemia.

Conclusions: Most individuals with active SARS-CoV-2 infection are likely to have concurrent antigenemia, but there may be some individuals with active infection in whom antigenemia is not detectable. The potential for high sensitivity and convenience of a blood test prompts interest in further investigation as a screening tool to reduce reliance on nasopharyngeal swab sampling and as an adjunct diagnostic test to aid in clinical decision making during the period after acute coronavirus disease 2019.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199120PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad226DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nasopharyngeal swab
16
blood plasma
8
nucleocapsid antigen
8
severe acute
8
acute respiratory
8
respiratory syndrome
8
syndrome coronavirus
8
sars-cov-2 infection
8
patients admitted
8
active sars-cov-2
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!