Perceptions of HIV risk screening strategies among patients seeking abortion, contraception, and pregnancy loss management in the United States.

Contraception

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Veterans Affairs Center for Health Equity, Research & Promotion, Micheal J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, USA.

Published: August 2023

Objectives: Women make up nearly a fifth of new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections yearly in the United States, more than half of which could have been prevented with broader use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We aimed to qualitatively assess (1) acceptability of an HIV risk screening strategy and PrEP provision in a family planning setting, and (2) the influence of family planning visit type (abortion, pregnancy loss management, or contraception) on HIV risk screening acceptability.

Study Design: Guided by the P3 (practice-, provider-, and patient-level) model for preventive care interventions, we conducted three focus group discussions including patients who had experienced induced abortion, early pregnancy loss (EPL), or contraception care. We developed a codebook of a priori and inductive concepts, and categorized themes by practice, provider, and patient considerations.

Results: We included 24 participants. Practice-level considerations included overall positive feelings about being screened for PrEP eligibility during family planning visits, though some expressed reservations about screening during EPL visits. Provider-level themes included the concept of screening tools as entry points into conversation and education, and the importance of nonjudgment in discussing sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention. Participants often had to initiate STI prevention discussions and felt that contraception was overemphasized by their providers compared with STI prevention and PrEP care. Patient-level themes included the stigma of STIs and oral PrEP, and the dynamic nature of STI risk.

Conclusions: Participants in our research had genuine interest in learning about PrEP during family planning visits. Findings from our research support the consistent inclusion of STI prevention education into family planning clinical practice using patient-centered STI screening methods.

Implications: Family planning encounters, including visits for contraception and abortion, are generally appropriate times to discuss HIV PrEP. Patient-centered conversations are an important adjunct to HIV risk screening tools.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110063DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

family planning
24
hiv risk
16
risk screening
16
sti prevention
16
pregnancy loss
12
loss management
8
united states
8
planning visits
8
themes included
8
screening tools
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!