Introduction Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cervical spondylosis refractory to analgesic medical management. Currently, there are numerous approaches and devices used; however, there is no single implant that is preferred for this procedure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the radiological outcomes of ACDF procedures performed in the regional spinal surgery centre in Northern Ireland. The results of this study will aid surgical decision-making, specifically with regard to the choice of implant. The implants that will be assessed in this study are the stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage (Cage) and the Zero-profile augmented screw implant (Z-P). Methods A total of 420 ACDF cases were reviewed retrospectively. Following exclusion and inclusion criteria, 233 cases were reviewed. In the Z-P group, there were 117 patients, with 116 in the Cage group. Radiographic assessment was carried out at the pre-operative stage, day one post-operation, and follow-up (> three months). Measured parameters included segmental disc height, segmental Cobb angle, and spondylolisthesis displacement distance. Results Patient characteristic features showed no significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05) and no significant difference in mean follow-up time (p=0.146). The Z-P implant was superior in increasing and maintaining disc height post-operatively (+0.4±0.94mm, 5.20±0.66mm) compared to the Cage (+0.1±1.00mm, 4.40±0.95mm) (p<0.001). Z-P was also more successful in restoring and maintaining cervical lordosis in comparison to the Cage group, as it had a significantly smaller kyphosis incidence (0.85% vs. 34.5%) at follow-up (p<0.001). Conclusions Results of this study show a more advantageous outcome in the Zero-profile group as it restores and maintains both disc height and cervical lordosis; it is also more successful in treating spondylolisthesis. This study advocates cautious endorsement of the use of the Zero-profile implant in ACDF procedures for symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10188236 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38864 | DOI Listing |
J Comput Assist Tomogr
November 2024
From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine.
Objective: Radiographic findings to identify central venous catheter misplacement in the arteries, which can cause lethal complications, have not been fully evaluated, and its training is difficult because it is rare. The purpose of this study is to clarify radiographic findings for differentiating central venous and misplaced arterial lines using virtual chest radiographs and elucidate their usefulness in training radiologists.
Methods: This retrospective study included 150 patients (mean age, 67 [SD, ±12] years; 97 men) who underwent colon cancer surgery between January 2018 and December 2020.
Clin Spine Surg
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Misericordia International Clinic, Barranquilla.
Study Design: Cohort retrospective study.
Objective: We evaluated and compared the outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (CDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy with iliac crest graft and fusion (CCF) in patients with ≥3 level degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).
Background: Anterior and posterior approaches are widely employed in DCM when compressive elements predominate in the anterior or posterior spinal cord, respectively.
N Am Spine Soc J
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Background: Previous research on spinal alignment and postoperative outcomes after cervical and upper thoracic fixation has suggested that clinical and patient-reported outcomes are improved when certain anatomical parameters are maintained. These parameters include the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), C2 and T1 slopes, and cervical lordosis (CL). For patients with primary and metastatic tumors involving the subaxial cervical and/or upper thoracic spine, there is minimal guidance on how to apply these parameters.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFN Am Spine Soc J
December 2024
Yale School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, United States.
Background: Posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) is a common spine surgery that may be considered in patients with underlying comorbidities, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Prior literature examining the association of this disease and PLF outcomes was done in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), which only assessed in-hospital data and did not reveal an elevated risk of medical or surgical complications. However, characterization of PLF outcomes beyond hospital discharge is important and remains unknown for patients with IBD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Exp Orthop
January 2025
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit Faculty of Medicine Lund University Lund Sweden.
Purpose: To investigate if hip and knee alignment assessed 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is associated with compartment-specific radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA) 3 years later.
Methods: An exploratory analysis was conducted in the knee ACL, nonsurgical versus surgical treatment (KANON) trial (ISRCTN84752559); 115 subjects with acute ACL injury were assessed at the 2-year follow-up; full-limb images of the injured leg were acquired, and the neck-shaft angle (NSA) and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) were measured. At the 5-year follow-up, weight-bearing tibiofemoral and patellofemoral radiographs were obtained.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!