17 RCTs for 15 digital health applications (DiGA) permanently listed in the state-regulated register were analyzed descriptively for methodological study aspects relevant to evidence analysis. The analysis revealed that several underlying studies had limitations, at least worthy of discussion, in terms of their power concerning sample size, intervention and control group specifications, drop-out rates, and blinding.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SHTI230165 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
health applications
12
digital health
8
evidence digital
4
applications state-regulated
4
state-regulated repository
4
repository reimbursable
4
reimbursable health
4
applications germany
4
germany rcts
4
rcts digital
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!