As health systems continue to consolidate at a rapid pace, many physicians are stepping into roles that involve managing other physicians. While more physicians are thrust into these positions each year, the managerial training they receive is highly variable and often insufficient for dealing with the challenges they will face, notably disruptive behaviour. Broadly defined, disruptive behaviour includes any actions that affect a team's ability to effectively care for patients, and can even threaten patient and provider health. New physician managers--who typically have little prior experience in management roles--need specific supports to address this uniquely daunting challenge.Over our management careers, we have spoken with dozens of new and experienced physician managers to understand how they manage disruptive behaviour in the workplace and to collect their advice for future physician managers. In this paper, we reflect on those conversations and distill them into a three-part approach for diagnosing, treating and preventing disruptive behaviour in the workplace. We describe how the right management approach depends on a thorough assessment of the most likely drivers of the disruptive behaviour. Second, we present strategies for treating the behaviour focusing on the physician leader's communication skills and available institutional resources. Finally, we advocate for system-level changes that institutions or departments can implement both to prevent disruptive behaviour and to better prepare new managers to address it.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/leader-2022-000615DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disruptive behaviour
28
physician managers
12
experienced physician
8
prevent disruptive
8
behaviour
8
behaviour workplace
8
disruptive
7
physician
5
i'd experienced
4
managers
4

Similar Publications

The aim of this study is to assess a pheromone complex-impregnated collar in the control of feline problem behaviors, and to assess the ease of use and tolerance of the collar compared with a regular collar. Six hundred and twenty-four cats from 459 households with one or more of four problem behaviors (problem urination, scratching, fear, or inter-cat conflict) were recruited to a 28-day study. Households were randomly assigned so that each cat received either a pheromone-impregnated polymer collar (containing 13% FELIWAY Optimum) or a control regular silicone collar.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Privacy fatigue caused by privacy data disclose and the complexity of privacy control has become an important factor influencing people's privacy decision-making behavior. At present, academia mainly studies privacy fatigue as a key determinant to explain the privacy paradox problem, but there is insufficient attention to its influencing factors and specific pathway of occurrence. Exploring the antecedents of privacy fatigue is of great significance for alleviating users' subjective privacy detachment and promoting privacy protection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Although there is ample evidence linking academic and behavioral domains, few studies have examined the long-term, varied impacts of academic performance trajectories on problem behavior outcomes, particularly in early and middle adolescence. This study examined the different three-year academic performance trajectories, their links with behavioral outcomes, and the demographic and educational predictors that distinguish these patterns. The sample consisted of 10,279 Chinese adolescents (46.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Contrasting two versions of the 4-cup 2-item disjunctive syllogism task in great apes.

Anim Cogn

January 2025

School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9AJ, UK.

Chimpanzees excel at inference tasks which require that they search for a single food item from partial information. Yet, when presented with 2-item tasks which test the same inference operation, chimpanzees show a consistent breakdown in performance. Here we test a diverse zoo-housed cohort (n = 24) comprising all 4 great ape species under the classic 4-cup 2-item task, previously administered to children and chimpanzees, and a modified task administered to baboons.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!