Purpose: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy.
Patients And Methods: Eligible patients had a performance status 0 to 2, previous treatment with one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC, and adequate organ function. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m intravenously (IV) day 1 with vitamin B, folic acid, and dexamethasone or docetaxel 75 mg/m IV day 1 with dexamethasone every 21 days. The primary end point was overall survival.
Results: Five hundred seventy-one patients were randomly assigned. Overall response rates were 9.1% and 8.8% (analysis of variance = .105) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months for each arm, and median survival time was 8.3 versus 7.9 months ( = not significant) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. The 1-year survival rate for each arm was 29.7%. Patients receiving docetaxel were more likely to have grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (40.2% 5.3%; < .001), febrile neutropenia (12.7% 1.9%; < .001), neutropenia with infections (3.3% 0.0%; = .004), hospitalizations for neutropenic fever (13.4% 1.5%; < .001), hospitalizations due to other drug related adverse events (10.5% 6.4%; = .092), use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (19.2% 2.6%, < .001) and all grade alopecia (37.7% 6.4%; < .001) compared with patients receiving pemetrexed.
Conclusion: Treatment with pemetrexed resulted in clinically equivalent efficacy outcomes, but with significantly fewer side effects compared with docetaxel in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and should be considered a standard treatment option for second-line NSCLC when available.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.02546 | DOI Listing |
Cancer Res Treat
December 2024
Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Purpose: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). Switch maintenance therapy after first-line (1L) treatment may delay disease progression. This study evaluated pemetrexed as switch maintenance therapy versus observation in aUC patients without disease progression after initial chemotherapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJTO Clin Res Rep
December 2024
Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
J Immunother Cancer
November 2024
Clinical Research and Development, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, Shanghai, China.
J Thorac Oncol
November 2024
Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) inhibitors, including olaparib, upregulate programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), which may increase efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 therapies.
Methods: In the phase 3 KEYLYNK-006 trial (NCT03976323), eligible adults with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without targetable genetic alterations who had complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) following induction therapy with 4 cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W, pemetrexed 500 mg/m , and carboplatin AUC5 or cisplatin 75 mg/m were randomized 1:1 to olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily or pemetrexed Q3W, both given with ≤31 cycles of pembrolizumab Q3W. Dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Lancet Respir Med
October 2024
Service de Pneumologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Université Rennes 1, INSERM, UMR_S 1242, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!