Randomized Phase III Trial of Pemetrexed Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Chemotherapy.

J Clin Oncol

From Indiana University and the Hoosier Oncology Group; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Princess Margaret Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Instituto Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, Sao Paolo, Brazil; San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben Switzerland; Fachklinik München, Gauting; Hospital Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf; Krankenhaus Hofheim Am Taunus, Hofheim; Thoraxklinik-Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National University Hospital, Singapore; Semmelweis Medical University Diosarok, Budapest, Hungary; Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France; Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

Published: May 2023

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy.

Patients And Methods: Eligible patients had a performance status 0 to 2, previous treatment with one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC, and adequate organ function. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m intravenously (IV) day 1 with vitamin B, folic acid, and dexamethasone or docetaxel 75 mg/m IV day 1 with dexamethasone every 21 days. The primary end point was overall survival.

Results: Five hundred seventy-one patients were randomly assigned. Overall response rates were 9.1% and 8.8% (analysis of variance = .105) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months for each arm, and median survival time was 8.3 versus 7.9 months ( = not significant) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. The 1-year survival rate for each arm was 29.7%. Patients receiving docetaxel were more likely to have grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (40.2% 5.3%; < .001), febrile neutropenia (12.7% 1.9%; < .001), neutropenia with infections (3.3% 0.0%; = .004), hospitalizations for neutropenic fever (13.4% 1.5%; < .001), hospitalizations due to other drug related adverse events (10.5% 6.4%; = .092), use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (19.2% 2.6%, < .001) and all grade alopecia (37.7% 6.4%; < .001) compared with patients receiving pemetrexed.

Conclusion: Treatment with pemetrexed resulted in clinically equivalent efficacy outcomes, but with significantly fewer side effects compared with docetaxel in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and should be considered a standard treatment option for second-line NSCLC when available.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.02546DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pemetrexed versus
8
versus docetaxel
8
patients
8
docetaxel patients
8
non-small-cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
patients advanced
8
advanced nsclc
8
pemetrexed docetaxel
8
patients receiving
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). Switch maintenance therapy after first-line (1L) treatment may delay disease progression. This study evaluated pemetrexed as switch maintenance therapy versus observation in aUC patients without disease progression after initial chemotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study on the combination of ipilimumab (ipi) and nivolumab (nivo) for treating malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in Switzerland revealed real-world survival and safety data, confirming its status as a standard-of-care after positive clinical trial results (CheckMate-743).
  • Among the 109 patients treated from November 2017 to March 2023, the objective response rate to ipi-nivo was 21% for first-line treatment and 15% for second or further-line treatments, with median overall survival being 12.6 months for first-line and 6.9 months for second-line.
  • The treatment was generally well-t
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A phase 3 study showed that combining camrelizumab with chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer compared to chemotherapy alone.
  • After 5 years, overall survival rates were 31.2% for those receiving camrelizumab and chemotherapy versus 19.3% for those on chemotherapy alone, indicating a substantial benefit.
  • Patients who completed two years of treatment with camrelizumab had an impressive 5-year overall survival rate of 84.3%, reinforcing its effectiveness and safety as a first-line therapy for this cancer type.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) inhibitors, including olaparib, upregulate programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), which may increase efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 therapies.

Methods: In the phase 3 KEYLYNK-006 trial (NCT03976323), eligible adults with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without targetable genetic alterations who had complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) following induction therapy with 4 cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W, pemetrexed 500 mg/m , and carboplatin AUC5 or cisplatin 75 mg/m were randomized 1:1 to olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily or pemetrexed Q3W, both given with ≤31 cycles of pembrolizumab Q3W. Dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the effectiveness of combined treatment with anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) antibodies compared to standard platinum-based chemotherapy in older patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
  • It focuses specifically on patients aged 70 years or older or those with an ECOG performance status of 2, as there is limited data on this demographic.
  • The trial is a phase 3 randomized controlled study conducted across 30 sites in France, aiming to evaluate overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety of the treatments in the intended patient population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!