Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Metabarcoding studies of fungal communities rely on curated databases for assigning taxonomy. Any host or other nonfungal environmental sequences that are amplified during polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are inherently assigned taxonomy by these same databases, possibly leading to ambiguous nonfungal amplicons being assigned to fungal taxa. Here, we investigated the effects of including nonfungal outgroups in a fungal taxonomic database to aid in detecting and removing these nontarget amplicons. We processed 15 publicly available fungal metabarcode data sets and discovered that roughly 40% of the reads from these studies were not fungal, although they were assigned as sp. when using a database without nonfungal outgroups. We discuss implications for metabarcoding studies and recommend assigning taxonomy using a database with outgroups to better detect these nonfungal amplicons.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2023.2206931 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!