Anti-chlamydial effects of azelastine hydrochloride and the impact of the histamine H1 receptor on chlamydial development.

J Med Microbiol

Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 268, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.

Published: May 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Azelastine hydrochloride, an H1 receptor antagonist, shows anti-chlamydial effects in both genital and ocular infection models using HeLa and conjunctival epithelial cells.
  • The timing of azelastine application is crucial, demonstrating more significant results when applied before or shortly after chlamydial infection, leading to reduced inclusion size and infectivity.
  • The study suggests that the anti-chlamydial effects of azelastine likely operate through mechanisms independent of H1 receptor modulation and may involve off-target actions.

Article Abstract

Azelastine hydrochloride, a second-generation histamine H1 receptor (H1R) antagonist, exhibits anti-chlamydial effects against (CT) in HeLa cells (genital infection model). Non-antibiotic pharmaceutical interactions with CT are an understudied field and the anti-chlamydial effects of azelastine are a potential interaction requiring further elucidation.. To explore the underlying anti-chlamydial mechanisms of azelastine. We assessed the specificity of azelastine for the chlamydial species and host cell type, the timing of azelastine application and whether the anti-chlamydial effects could be reproduced with different H1R-modulating compounds. We observed similar anti-chlamydial azelastine effects for as well as for an ocular CT strain in human conjunctival epithelial cells (ocular infection model). Pre-incubating host cells with azelastine before infection mildly reduced chlamydial inclusion numbers and infectivity. Incubation of cells with azelastine initiated concomitantly with the chlamydial infection, or initiated several hours post-infection, reduced inclusion size, number and infectivity, and altered chlamydial morphology. These effects were strongest when azelastine was added shortly after or with the infection. Azelastine effects were not alleviated by increased concentrations of culture medium nutrients. Additionally, we did not observe anti-chlamydial effects when incubating cultures either with a different H1R antagonist or agonist, indicating that azelastine effects are probably H1R-independent. Accordingly, we conclude that azelastine anti-chlamydial effects are not restricted to a specific chlamydial species, strain or culture model, and are probably not mediated by H1R antagonism. Thus, it appears likely that off-target mechanisms of azelastine may explain our observations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001691DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anti-chlamydial effects
24
azelastine
14
azelastine effects
12
effects
9
anti-chlamydial
8
effects azelastine
8
azelastine hydrochloride
8
histamine receptor
8
h1r antagonist
8
infection model
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!