Pain Catastrophizing and Impact on Pelvic Floor Surgery Experience.

Urogynecology (Phila)

From the Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Published: December 2023

Importance: Understanding patients' perceptions of symptoms and outcomes of urogynecologic surgery is essential for providing high-quality care.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess association of pain catastrophizing with pelvic floor symptom distress and impact, postoperative pain, and voiding trial in patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery.

Study Design: Individuals whose self-identified gender was female and were undergoing surgery March 2020-December 2021 were included. Participants completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (range 0-52), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire preoperatively. Pain catastrophizing was score ≥30 and describes the tendency to magnify the overall threat of pain. Voiding trial failure was inability to void ≥2/3 of instilled volume (≤300 mL). The association between pain catastrophizing and symptom distress and impact was assessed with linear regression. A P < 0.05 is significant.

Results: Three hundred twenty patients were included (mean age, 60 years, 87% White). Forty-six of 320 participants (14%) had a pain catastrophizing score ≥30. The pain catastrophizing group had higher body mass index (33 ± 12 vs 29 ± 5), more benzodiazepine use (26% vs 12%), greater symptom distress (154 ± 58 vs 108 ± 60), and greater urogenital (59 ± 29 vs 47 ± 28), colorectal (42 ± 24 vs 26 ± 23), and prolapse (54 ± 24 vs 36 ± 24) subscale scores, all P ≤ 0.02. The pain catastrophizing group had greater impact (153 ± 72 vs 72 ± 64, P < 0.01) and urogenital (60 ± 29 vs 34 ± 28), colorectal (36 ± 33 vs 16 ± 26), and prolapse (57 ± 32 vs 22 ± 27) subscale scores, P < 0.01. Associations remained controlling for confounders ( P < 0.01). The pain catastrophizing group had higher 10-point pain scores (8 vs 6, P < 0.01) and was more likely to report pain at 2 weeks (59% vs 20%, P < 0.01) and 3 months (25% vs 6%, P = 0.01). Voiding trial failure did not differ (26% vs 28%, P = 0.98).

Conclusions: Pain catastrophizing is associated with greater pelvic floor symptom distress and impact and postoperative pain but not voiding trial failure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001365DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pain catastrophizing
40
pelvic floor
20
symptom distress
16
voiding trial
16
pain
15
distress impact
12
pain voiding
12
trial failure
12
catastrophizing group
12
catastrophizing
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!