AI Article Synopsis

  • - A study investigated a rolling circle amplification (RCA) method using cell-free DNA for screening trisomies, revealing a problematic 1% false positive rate and variable assay performance, prompting a multi-center review.
  • - Data from multiple labs showed significant improvement in the precision of results over time, with the percentage of runs exceeding standard deviation caps for multiple chromosomes decreasing sharply after reformulations in reagents and software updates.
  • - The refined method achieved high detection rates (98.4%) and drastically reduced false positive rates (0.3%), making it competitive with other screening techniques while minimizing test failure after re-testing.

Article Abstract

Objective: A rolling circle amplification (RCA) based commercial methodology using cell-free (cf)DNA to screen for common trisomies became available in 2018. Relevant publications documented high detection but with a higher than expected 1% false positive rate. Preliminary evidence suggested assay variability was an issue. A multi-center collaboration was created to explore this further and examine whether subsequent manufacturer changes were effective.

Methods: Three academic (four devices) and two commercial (two devices) laboratories provided run date, chromosome 21, 18, and 13 run-specific standard deviations, number of samples run, and reagent lot identifications. Temporal trends and between-site/device consistency were explored. Proportions of run standard deviations exceeding pre-specified caps of 0.4%, 0.4% and 0.6% were computed.

Results: Overall, 661 RCA runs between April 2019 and July 30, 2022 tested 39,756 samples. In the first 24, subsequent 9, and final 7 months, proportions of capped chromosome 21 runs dropped from 39% to 22% to 6.0%; for chromosome 18, rates were 76%, 36%, and 4.0%. Few chromosome 13 runs were capped using the original 0.60%, but capping at 0.50%, rates were 28%, 16%, and 7.6%. Final rates occurred after reformulated reagents and imaging software modifications were fully implemented across all devices. Revised detection and false positive rates are estimated at 98.4% and 0.3%, respectively. After repeat testing, failure rates may be as low as 0.3%.

Conclusion: Current RCA-based screening performance estimates are equivalent to those reported for other methods, but with a lower test failure rate after repeat testing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629251PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413231173315DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rolling circle
8
circle amplification
8
false positive
8
standard deviations
8
chromosome runs
8
repeat testing
8
rates
5
cell-free dna-based
4
dna-based prenatal
4
prenatal screening
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!