Background: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of our enhanced recovery after surgery protocol including early oral intake and omitting nasogastric tube (NGT) placement after total gastrectomy.
Methods: We analyzed 182 consecutive patients who underwent total gastrectomy. The clinical pathway was changed in 2015, and patients were divided into 2 groups (conventional group and modified group). Postoperative complications, bowel movement, and postoperative hospital stays were compared in the two groups in all cases and propensity score matching (PSM).
Results: Flatus and defecation were significantly earlier in the modified group compared with those in the conventional group (flatus: 2 (1-5) days vs 3 (2-12) days, p = 0.03; defecation: 4 (1-14) days vs 6 (2-12) days p = 0.04). The postoperative hospital stay was 18 (6-90) days in the conventional group and 14 (7-74) days in the modified group (p = 0.009). Days until discharge criteria were met were earlier in the modified group compared with that in the conventional group (10 (7-69) days vs 14 (6-84) days p = 0.01). Overall and severe complications occurred in nine patients (12.6%) and three patients (4.2%) in the conventional group and twelve patients (10.8%) and four patients (3.6%) in the modified group, respectively (p = 0.70 and p = 0.83) in all cases. In PSM, there is no significant difference between the two groups concerning the postoperative complications (overall complication 6 (12.5%) vs 8 (16.7%) p = 0.56, severe complications 1 (2%) vs 2 (4.2%) p = 0.83).
Conclusions: Modified ERAS for total gastrectomy may be feasible and safe.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186788 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03034-5 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!