The accuracy and precision of acetabular implant measurements from CT imaging.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol

Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Published: April 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The positioning of acetabular implant components during total hip replacement (THR) is crucial for both immediate and long-term results, and several tools have been created to help surgeons achieve the desired orientation.
  • A study compared measurements of acetabular components placed in pelvic models using different imaging techniques, specifically 3D-CT and two types of 2D-CT, to evaluate their accuracy.
  • Results indicated that 3D-CT closely matched "true values" for component positioning and showed strong agreement with a coordinate measuring system, suggesting that low radiation dose 3D-CT is a reliable method for assessing acetabular cup orientation.

Article Abstract

The placement of acetabular implant components determines the short- and long-term outcomes of total hip replacement (THR) and a number of tools have been developed to assist the surgeon in achieving cup orientation to match the surgical plan. However, the accuracy and precision of 3D-CT for the measurement of acetabular component position and orientation is yet to be established. To investigate this, we compared measurements of cobalt chrome acetabular components implanted into 2 different bony pelvic models between a coordinate measuring Faro arm and 3 different low dose CT images, including 3D-CT, 2D anterior pelvic plane (APP) referenced CT and 2D scanner referenced (SR) CT. Intra-observer differences were assessed using the Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The effect of imaging the pelvis positioned in 3 different orientations within the CT scanner was also assessed. The measured parameters were the angles of inclination and version. 3D-CT measurements were found to closely match the "true values" of the component position measurements, compared with the 2D-CT methods. ICC analysis also showed good agreement between the coordinate measuring arm (CMA) and 3D-CT but poor agreement between the 2D SR method, in the results from two observers. When using the coordinate system of the CT scanner, the measurements consistently produced the greatest error; this method yielded values up to 34° different from the reference digitising arm. However, the difference between the true inclination and version angles and those measured from 3D APP CT was below half a degree in all cases. We concluded that low radiation dose 3D-CT is a validated reference standard for the measurement of acetabular cup orientation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175694PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1150061DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

accuracy precision
8
acetabular implant
8
cup orientation
8
measurement acetabular
8
component position
8
coordinate measuring
8
inclination version
8
acetabular
5
measurements
5
3d-ct
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!