AI Article Synopsis

  • A previous study struggled to differentiate between intact fibrous cap (IFC) and ruptured fibrous cap (RFC) lesions in patients with coronary artery disease, prompting this study to assess the effectiveness of coronary CT imaging before procedures for acute myocardial infarction.
  • In analyzing 186 patients, researchers found that various CT markers were significantly lower in the IFC group, which helped highlight critical differences in plaque characteristics between IFC and RFC lesions.
  • The study concluded that preprocedural coronary CT imaging can reliably distinguish between IFC and RFC lesions, helping to identify higher-risk patients non-invasively.

Article Abstract

Background A previous coronary computed tomography (CT) angiographic study failed to discriminate optical coherence tomography-defined intact fibrous cap culprit lesions (IFC group) from those with ruptured fibrous caps (RFC group) in patients with coronary artery disease. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of preprocedural coronary CT imaging in identifying subsequently performed optical coherence tomography-defined plaque rupture or erosion at culprit lesions in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results This study used data from 2 recently published studies that tested the hypothesis that coronary CT angiography (CCTA) before percutaneous coronary intervention may provide diagnostic information on the high-risk atherosclerotic burden in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction. In the analysis of 186 patients, optical coherence tomography identified 106 RFC plaques and 80 IFC plaques as the culprit lesions. On CT, the prevalence of low-attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, napkin-ring sign, and spotty calcification were all significantly lower in the IFC group. The culprit vessel pericoronary adipose tissue inflammation and coronary artery calcium scores were significantly lower in the IFC group than in the RFC group. The absence of low-attenuation plaque, napkin-ring sign, zero coronary artery calcium, and low pericoronary adipose tissue inflammation were independent predictors of IFC. When stratified into 5 subgroups according to the number of these 4 CT factors, the prevalence of IFC was 8.3%, 20.8%, 44.6%, 75.6%, and 100% (<0.001), respectively. Conclusions Preprocedural comprehensive coronary CT imaging, including coronary artery calcium and pericoronary adipose tissue inflammation assessment, can accurately and noninvasively identify optical coherence tomography-defined IFC or RFC culprit lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227319PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.029239DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

optical coherence
16
coherence tomography-defined
12
culprit lesions
12
ifc group
12
coronary artery
12
coronary
8
computed tomography
8
rfc group
8
patients non-st-segment-elevation
8
non-st-segment-elevation acute
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!