A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Parameters Associated With Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Patients. | LitMetric

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Parameters Associated With Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Patients.

Transplant Proc

Department of Urology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Chang Gung Transplant Institute, Taoyuan, Taiwan. Electronic address:

Published: May 2023

Purpose: Intraoperative hemodynamic instability was proven to be associated with delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation. This retrospective study aims to find the specific intraoperative hemodynamic parameters as an efficient predicting factor of DGF.

Materials And Methods: Patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2020 and 2022 were enrolled and classified into DGF and non-DGF groups. Pediatric and multiorgan recipients were excluded. Hemodynamic parameters such as central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and cardiac index (CI) at the timings of wound incision, graft reperfusion, and operation completion were recorded, respectively. A comparison of parameters between these 2 groups was analyzed.

Results: We enrolled 42 recipients, with 26 in the DGF group and 16 in the non-DGF group. Compared with the DGF group, CI around graft reperfusion was significantly higher in the non-DGF group (3.97 vs 4.67 L/min/m, P = .043). Other hemodynamic variables revealed no statistical difference. In the results of multivariate analysis, the deceased donor source, the greater volume of blood loss, and the lower CI around graft reperfusion were considered independent risk factors for DGF. Using CI around graft reperfusion to conduct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for DGF prediction, the area under the ROC curve achieved a value of 0.739 (95% confidence interval, 0.579-0.900), with the optimal cut-point value at CI = 4.245 L/min/m.

Conclusion: The cardiac index value around graft reperfusion was statistically associated with the incidence of DGF and might be used as a valid predicting factor.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.03.050DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

graft reperfusion
20
intraoperative hemodynamic
12
hemodynamic parameters
12
associated delayed
8
delayed graft
8
graft function
8
kidney transplantation
8
predicting factor
8
dgf group
8
non-dgf group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!