A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Risk Factors and Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Wound Infections after Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • A study investigated risk factors for wound infections in patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertions, tracking over 600 cases for three years.
  • Of those studied, 25% developed wound infections, with higher risks associated with nicotine use, history of ischemic stroke, and head and neck cancer.
  • The most common bacteria found in these infections were Enterobacterales, and the study concluded that antibiotic prophylaxis did not significantly reduce infection rates, indicating a need for better clinical practices.

Article Abstract

Background And Study Aim: The incidence of wound infections after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) varies widely in recent studies. The present study systematically investigates the underlying risk factors for the development of wound infections in a large cohort of patients over a long-term follow-up period.

Patients And Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing PEG insertion using either the pull or push technique was conducted and patients followed up for 3 years. Tube-related wound infections were identified, and pathogens regularly cultured from wound swabs. Adjusted analysis was performed via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: 616 patients were included in this study. A total of 25% percent of patients developed wound infections upon PEG tube insertion and 6.5% showed recurrent infections. Nicotine abuse ( = 0.01), previous ischemic stroke ( = 0.01) and head and neck cancer ( < 0.001) showed an increased risk for wound infection after PEG placement. Moreover, radio-chemotherapy was associated with the occurrence of wound infections ( < 0.001). Infection rates were similar between pull and push cohorts. The most common bacterial pathogen detected was Enterobacterales (19.2%). , and were frequently detected in recurrent infection (14.2%, 11.4% and 9.6%, respectively). Antibiotic prophylaxis showed no effect on infection rates.

Conclusions: Wound infections after PEG placement are common and occasionally occur as recurrent infections. There is potential for improvement in everyday clinical practice, particularly regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in accordance with guidelines.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179185PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093175DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wound infections
28
antibiotic prophylaxis
12
wound
9
infections
9
risk factors
8
infections percutaneous
8
percutaneous endoscopic
8
endoscopic gastrostomy
8
pull push
8
infections peg
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!