A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Artifact-Free Microstructures in the Interfacial Reaction between Eutectic In-48Sn and Cu Using Ion Milling. | LitMetric

Eutectic In-48Sn was considered a promising candidate for low-temperature solder due to its low melting point and excellent mechanical properties. Both Cu(In,Sn) and Cu(In,Sn) formation were observed at the In-48Sn/Cu interface after 160 °C soldering. However, traditional mechanical polishing produces many defects at the In-48Sn/Cu interface, which may affect the accuracy of interfacial reaction investigations. In this study, cryogenic broad Ar beam ion milling was used to investigate the interfacial reaction between In-48Sn and Cu during soldering. The phase Cu(Sn,In) was confirmed as the only intermetallic compound formed during 150 °C soldering, while Cu(In,Sn) formation was proven to be caused by room-temperature aging after soldering. Both the Cu(Sn,In) and Cu(In,Sn) phases were confirmed by EPMA quantitative analysis and TEM selected area electron diffraction. The microstructure evolution and growth mechanism of Cu(Sn,In) during soldering were proposed. In addition, the Young's modulus and hardness of Cu(Sn,In) were determined to be 119.04 ± 3.94 GPa and 6.28 ± 0.13 GPa, respectively, suggesting that the doping of In in Cu(Sn,In) has almost no effect on Young's modulus and hardness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10179094PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16093290DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interfacial reaction
12
eutectic in-48sn
8
ion milling
8
cuinsn formation
8
in-48sn/cu interface
8
°c soldering
8
young's modulus
8
modulus hardness
8
soldering
5
cusnin
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!