Comparison of Changes in Chest Wall Mechanics and Respiratory Timing Between Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia and Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Upper abdominal surgery is associated with postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction. Whether patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is superior to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) in preventing postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction is still unclear in laparoscopic gastric surgery.

Methods: Sixteen patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy randomly received either PCEA or IV-PCA. The primary outcomes were the change in chest wall mechanics and respiratory timing, measured by respiratory inductive plethysmography (Respitrace; Ambulatory Monitoring Inc., Ardsley, New York, United States) before and after surgery, and analyzed by a data acquisition system (PowerLab; ADInstruments, Dunedin, New Zealand). Inspiratory time (Ti), expiratory time (Te), total respiratory cycle time (Ttot), proportion of inspiratory time over total respiratory cycle time (Ti/Ttot), respiratory rate (RR), and abdominal contribution to tidal volume (AB/V [%]) were calculated from the stored data. AB/V, relative volume contribution of diaphragm to tidal breathing, represents an index of diaphragmatic function. Because the diaphragm is the main contributor to tidal volume, decreases in AB/V indicate diaphragm dysfunction. Changes in outcomes over time between the two groups were analyzed using a linear mixed model, and two-sided values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain score (visual analog scale (VAS)), bowel function recovery, and hospital stay duration.

Results: Postoperative AB/V in the IV-PCA group was significantly decreased compared to preoperative levels. AB/V in the PCEA group was significantly higher than the IV-PCA group on postoperative day (POD) 1. Change in AB/V over time between the PCEA group and the IV-PCA group differed significantly ( = 0.01). A decrease of AB/V during POD 1 to 3 was observed in the IV-PCA group but not in the PCEA group. As for respiratory timing, there were significant increases in RR with a reduction of Te and Ttot compared to preoperative levels on POD 1 in the PCEA group. There were significant decreases in RR and Ti/Ttot with an increase of Te and Ttot compared to preoperative levels on POD 1 in the IV-PCA group. There was a significant difference in the change of the Ttot over time between the two groups ( = 0.046). There were no significant differences in the changes of Te, Ti/Ttot, Ti, and RR over time between the two groups. There was no significant difference in VAS over time at rest and mobilization, recovery of bowel function, and hospital stay between the two groups.

Conclusions: Continuous ropivacaine infusion with PCEA partially attenuated diaphragmatic dysfunction after laparoscopic gastrectomy, while pain relief by continuous intravenous administration of fentanyl could not attenuate diaphragmatic dysfunction. This suggests that PCEA might ameliorate postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction after laparoscopic gastrectomy.