Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: Rudimentary otocyst (RO) is characterized by an otic capsule without an internal auditory canal, which is considered a contraindication to cochlear implantation (CI). In this study, we were the first to report two patients with ROs who underwent CI.
Patient: Two patients (18 months old and 2 years old) presenting with bilateral congenital hearing loss were diagnosed with ROs.
Intervention: CI was performed. The transmastoid slotted labyrinthotomy approach was used with customized MED-EL electrode arrays.
Main Outcome Measures: Categorical auditory performance, infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration of sound, the speech intelligibility rating, and meaningful use of speech scale.
Results: Both children could understand common phrases and had intelligible, connected speech 2 years after CI.
Conclusion: With proper indication, surgical approach and postoperative training, a child with an RO may benefit from CI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003875 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!