A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A magnetic endourethral sphincter against stress urinary incontinence: preliminary pilot study in humans. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Urinary incontinence (UI) is when people can’t control their bladder, and it can make life tough for them.
  • The study tested a new, less invasive device called a magnetic endourethral sphincter on six patients who didn’t get better with other treatments.
  • After 28 days, most patients felt a lot better and didn't have much pain, but the device might need some improvements for the best results.

Article Abstract

Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common and frustrating condition that affects patients' quality of life as well as the Healthcare systems. Currently, the most severe cases of UI are treated using implanted, invasive artificial sphincters. We propose an innovative, minimally invasive magnetic endourethral sphincter for the treatment of stress UI (SUI) in patients for whom previous medical and surgical treatments have failed.

Methods: Six patients with severe SUI were enrolled at a single center and underwent cystoscopic sphincter implantation. After 10 days, correct device position was confirmed by ultrasonography. The sphincter was explanted after 28 days.

Results: In all patients, the sphincter was successfully implanted using an endoscopic approach. One patient reached the end of the pilot test (28 days) with the sphincter correctly placed. Patients' responses on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form questionnaire improved from a score of 18 out of 21 at the screening visit (UI without reasons) to a score of 3 out of 21 (almost perfect continence). No major pain and discomfort were reported.

Conclusions: This study showed the feasibility of sphincter implantation, explantation, and overall tolerability, although a redesign of the sphincter distal part is needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05190-XDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

magnetic endourethral
8
sphincter
8
endourethral sphincter
8
urinary incontinence
8
sphincter implantation
8
sphincter stress
4
stress urinary
4
incontinence
4
incontinence preliminary
4
preliminary pilot
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!