Objectives: To assess: (1) the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) with item response theory (IRT) to determine which individual items provide the most information, (2) the extent to which dysphagia is measured with subsets of items while maintaining precise score estimates, and (3) if 5-item scales have the differing discriminatory ability, as compared to the parent 10-item instrument.
Methods: Prospectively collected data from 2,339 patients who completed the EAT-10 questionnaire during evaluation at a tertiary care otolaryngology clinic were utilized. IRT analyses provided discrimination and location parameters associated with individual questions. Residual item correlations were also assessed for redundant information. Based on these results, three 5-item subsets were further evaluated using item information function curves. Areas under receiver-operator characteristic curves (ROC-AUC) were also calculated to evaluate the discriminatory ability for dysphagia-related clinical diagnoses.
Results: Item discrimination parameter estimates ranged from 1.71 to 5.46, with higher values indicating more information. Residual item correlations were determined within item pairs, and location parameters were calculated. Based on these data, in combination with clinical utility, three 5-item subsets were proposed and assessed. ROC-AUC analyses demonstrated no significant difference between the EAT-5-Alpha subset and the original 10-item instrument for discriminating dysphagia as a primary diagnosis (0.88, 0.88). The EAT-5-Clinical subset outperformed the original 10 instruments in ROC-AUC for aspiration. The EAT-5-Range subset was significantly associated with problems with thin liquids.
Conclusions: IRT analyses distinguished three proposed 5-item subsets of the EAT-10 instrument, supporting shorter survey options, while still reflecting the impact of dysphagia without significant loss of discrimination.
Level Of Evidence: 3 (Diagnostic testing with consistently applied reference standards, partial blinding). Laryngoscope, 133:3327-3333, 2023.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.30732 | DOI Listing |
Gen Hosp Psychiatry
December 2024
San Francisco VA Health Care System, USA; University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, USA.
Objective: To develop a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) eating disorder screener.
Method: Veterans enrolled in VA healthcare (N = 344) completed a survey of screening items and established measures. A validation subset (n = 166) participated in diagnostic interviews to confirm an eating disorder diagnosis.
Psychooncology
November 2024
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Objective: Access to work accommodations, such as time off to attend medical appointments, is a key predictor of cancer-related job loss. We aimed to develop and validate a measure of self-efficacy to request and obtain work accommodations related to diagnosis of breast cancer and need for treatment.
Methods: The 5-item Self-efficacy to Ask for Work Accommodations (SAWA) tool was adapted from a scale that measures self-efficacy in patient-physician interactions.
Langenbecks Arch Surg
October 2024
Department of Surgery, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St 10 Eaton North, Room 216, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
Qual Life Res
August 2024
Patient Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Purpose: This study evaluates the interpretability of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-16 profile domain scores (physical function, ability to participate in social roles and activities, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, pain interference, cognitive function - abilities, and fatigue) compared to the PROMIS-29 scores and a 5-item PROMIS cognitive function score. The study aims to provide insights into using these measures in clinical and research settings.
Methods: Analyses were conducted using data from 4130 adults from a nationally representative, probability-based internet panel between September and October 2022.
Salud Publica Mex
December 2023
UNAMPrograma Universitario de Estudios del Desarrollo, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Mexico City, Mexico..
Objective: To investigate the degree in which answer patterns in the Household Water Insecurity Experiences Scale (HWISE) relate to scores aiming at identifying latent groups with different water insecurity levels in a nationwide representative sample of the Mexican population.
Materials And Methods: Based on data from the 2021 National Survey on Health and Nutrition (Estudio Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2021, Ensanut 2021), sequence data representations, and a latent class analysis (LCA), in this article we estimate the likely misclassification errors of different cutoffs proposed for the HWISE scoring system.
Results: The main results suggest that a 5-item subset of the HWISE may exhibit a more reliable and cost-effective behavior than the complete 12-item set for a 2-level partition of the sample.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!