Background: One of the main uses of artificial intelligence in the field of orthodontics is automated cephalometric analysis. Aim of the present study was to evaluate whether developmental stages of a dentition, fixed orthodontic appliances or other dental appliances may affect detection of cephalometric landmarks.
Methods: For the purposes of this study a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for automated detection of cephalometric landmarks was developed. The model was trained on 430 cephalometric radiographs and its performance was then tested on 460 new radiographs. The accuracy of landmark detection in patients with permanent dentition was compared with that in patients with mixed dentition. Furthermore, the influence of fixed orthodontic appliances and orthodontic brackets and/or bands was investigated only in patients with permanent dentition. A t-test was performed to evaluate the mean radial errors (MREs) against the corresponding SDs for each landmark in the two categories, of which the significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results: The study showed significant differences in the recognition accuracy of the Ap-Inferior point and the Is-Superior point between patients with permanent dentition and mixed dentition, and no significant differences in the recognition process between patients without fixed orthodontic appliances and patients with orthodontic brackets and/or bands and other fixed orthodontic appliances.
Conclusions: The results indicated that growth structures and developmental stages of a dentition had an impact on the performance of the customized CNN model by dental cephalometric landmarks. Fixed orthodontic appliances such as brackets, bands, and other fixed orthodontic appliances, had no significant effect on the performance of the CNN model.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173502 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02984-2 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
November 2024
Prosthodontics, Adesh Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Bathinda, IND.
Background Cephalometric analysis is essential in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. With the emergence of digital tools for cephalometric analysis such as OneCeph, WebCeph, and NemoCeph, there is growing interest in their reliability compared to traditional manual tracings. This study aimed to compare the reliability of these digital tools with manual tracings in doing cephalometric analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiagnostics (Basel)
November 2024
Medical Device Development Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation (K-MEDI Hub), Daegu 41061, Republic of Korea.
Background: Cephalometric analysis is important in diagnosing and planning treatments for patients, traditionally relying on 2D cephalometric radiographs. With advancements in 3D imaging, automated landmark detection using deep learning has gained prominence. However, 3D imaging introduces challenges due to increased network complexity and computational demands.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Oral Investig
November 2024
Dean and Professor of Orthodontics, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of two web-based automated cephalometric landmark identification and analysis programs. Manual landmark identification using Dolphin Imaging software was used as reference.
Materials And Methods: 105 cephalograms were selected and divided into three groups of 35 subjects each, Class I, II and III.
Comput Biol Med
December 2024
Dept. of Oral Medicine and Radiology, JSS Dental College & Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru, India.
Background: Cephalometric landmark annotation is a key challenge in radiographic analysis, requiring automation due to its time-consuming process and inherent subjectivity. This study investigates the application of advanced transfer learning techniques to enhance the accuracy of anatomical landmarks in cephalometric images, which is a vital aspect of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Methods: We assess the suitability of transfer learning methods by employing state-of-the-art pose estimation models.
Int Orthod
December 2024
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, LSU Health New Orleans, 1100 Florida Avenue, 70119 New Orleans, LA, USA.
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and precision of the AudaxCeph® fully automated software in identifying cephalometric landmarks on lateral cephalograms of Class II and Class III skeletal relationships, comparing its performance against experienced orthodontists using manual tracing within the same software environment.
Material And Methods: Sixty cephalograms depicting severe Class II or Class III skeletal discrepancies were assessed by two board-certified orthodontists and AudaxCeph®'s artificial intelligence automatic tracing software. Among these, 40 cases were classified as Class II and 20 as Class III.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!