Sex-Related Disparities in Acute Limb Ischemia Treatment Outcomes.

Background: Although a substantial impetus behind disparities research in healthcare exists, those that are sex-related within vascular surgery outcomes are largely unexplored. Consequently, published guidelines lack specificity when it comes to treating male and female patients with vascular disease. Disparities related to patients suffering from chronic limb-threatening ischemia have been broached, although no extensive studies assessing disparities in acute limb ischemia treatment outcomes have come to the forefront. In this study, our aim is to identify and quantify sex-related disparities as they pertain to interventions for acute limb ischemia.

Methods: Using the TriNetX global research network, we conducted a multicenter query across 48 healthcare organizations spanning 5 countries for patients treated for acute limb ischemia. We determined the number of male and female patients that received one of the following interventions: open revascularization, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, or catheter-directed thrombolysis and/or adjunctive endovascular procedures. Propensity score matching was performed to account for comorbidities. Risk of adverse outcomes within 30 days was calculated for each sex, including reintervention, major amputation, and death. Risk of adverse outcomes was then compared between treatment groups of the same sex and between sexes. Type-I errors were reduced through utilization of the Holm-Bonferroni method to correct P values.

Results: Within our study, we noted several important findings. Females were more likely to receive catheter-directed thrombolysis and/or adjunctive endovascular procedures (P = 0.001) than males. There were no significant differences in the rates of open revascularization or percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy between males and females. Overall, females were more likely to die within 30 days (P < 0.0001) and greater number of males required reintervention within 30 days (P < 0.0001). Analyzing outcomes within individual treatment groups, females undergoing open revascularization or catheter-directed thrombolysis and/or adjunctive endovascular intervention demonstrated a profound increase in mortality within 30 days of intervention (P = 0.0072 and P = 0.0206, respectively), but these differences were not reflected in the percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy group. Limb salvage rates in females were higher than males overall although there were no significant sex differences within any treatment groups specifically.

Conclusions: In conclusion, there was a significantly higher risk of death in females across all treatment groups in the studied timeframe. Limb salvage rates were higher for females in the open revascularization (OR) treatment group, while males were more likely to require a reintervention across all treatment groups. By evaluating these disparities, we can provide greater insight into personalized treatment for patients presenting with acute limb ischemia.