A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cleaning the dose falloff with low modulation in SBRT lung plans. | LitMetric

This dosimetric study is intended to lower the modulation factor in lung SBRT plans generated in the Eclipse TPS that could replace highly modulated plans that are prone to the interplay effect.Twenty clinical lung SBRT plans with high modulation factors (≥4) were replanned in Varian Eclipse TPS version 15.5 utilizing 2 mm craniocaudal and 1 mm axial block margins followed by light optimization in order to reduce modulation. A unique plan optimization methodology, which utilizes a novel shell structure (OptiForR) for Roptimization in addition to five consecutive concentric 5 mm shells, was utilized to control dose falloff according to RTOG 0813 and 0915 recommendations. The prescription varied from 34-54 Gy in 1-4 fractions, and the dose objectives were PTV D= Rx, PTV D< 140% of Rx, and minimizing the modulation factor. Plan evaluation metrics included modulation factor, CI, homogeneity index (HI), R, D, V, and lung V(Timmerman Constraint). A random-intercept linear mixed effects model was used with a p ≤ 0.05 threshold to test for statistical significance.The retrospectively generated plans had significantly lower modulation factors (3.65 ± 0.35 versus 4.59 ± 0.54; p < 0.001), lower CI(0.97 ± 0.02 versus 1.02 ± 0.06; p = 0.001), higher HI (1.35 ± 0.06 versus 1.14 ± 0.04; p < 0.001), lower R(4.09 ± 0.45 versus 4.56 ± 0.56; p < 0.001), and lower lungs V(Timmerman) (4.61% ± 3.18% versus 4.92% ± 3.37%; p < 0.001). The high dose spillage Vwas borderline significantly lower (0.44% ± 0.49% versus 1.10% ± 1.64%; p = 0.051). The Dwas not statistically different (46.06% ± 4.01% versus 46.19% ± 2.80%; p = 0.835).Lung SBRT plans with significantly lower modulation factors can be generated that meet the RTOG constraints, using our planning strategy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/acd008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lower modulation
12
modulation factor
12
sbrt plans
12
modulation factors
12
0001 lower
12
dose falloff
8
modulation
8
lung sbrt
8
eclipse tps
8
plans lower
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!