Background And Objectives: Overutilization of phlebotomy tubes at healthcare facilities leads to iatrogenic anemia, patient dissatisfaction, and increase in operational costs. In this study, we analyzed the phlebotomy tube usage data at the Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, to show potential inefficiencies with phlebotomy tube usage.
Methods: Data of 984,078 patients with 1,408,175 orders and 4,622,349 total phlebotomy tubes were collected during years 2018-2021. Data of different patient types were compared. Furthermore, we assessed the data from subspecialty and test levels to explore the factors influencing the increase in phlebotomy tube usage.
Results: We observed an overall 8% increase in both the mean number of tubes used and blood loss per order over the past 4 years. The mean blood loss per day for intensive care unit (ICU) patients was 18.7 ml (maximum 121.6 ml), which was well under the 200 ml/day threshold. However, the maximum number of tubes used reached more than 30 tubes/day.
Conclusions: The 8% increase of phlebotomy tubes over 4 years should alarm laboratory managements, as tests offered are expected to increase in the future. Importantly, the whole healthcare community needs to work together to solve this problem with more creative solutions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149253 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15334 | DOI Listing |
BACKGROUND : Blood loss from phlebotomy is a significant cause of hospital-acquired anemia. Use of small-volume (Pedi) tubes in adult patients reduces blood loss by 40% and does not increase need for repeated labs. Although this practice is evidencebased, it has not been widely implemented.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVox Sang
November 2024
Department of Transfusion Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Background And Objectives: Wrong blood in tube (WBIT) continues to be a preventable cause of unintended harm to the patient. The literature describing extent of the problem, its consequences and factors leading to WBIT from the perspective of lower middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. The present study describes WBIT and its outcome in a hospital-based blood centre from an LMIC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
September 2024
Transfusion Medicine, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, IND.
Eur J Oncol Nurs
October 2024
SC Medicina di Laboratorio, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1 20133 Milan, Italy.
Purpose: Difficult venous access (DVA), characterized by non-visible and non-palpable veins, is common in oncology patients. The objectives of this study were to compare the performances of two blood collection sets in an oncology phlebotomy setting: BD Vacutainer® UltraTouch™ Push Button (UT-PBBCS) and BD Vacutainer® Safety-Lok™ Blood Collection Set (SLBCS). The two sets were evaluated to assess whether use of a smaller gauge (G) needle (down-gauging) may reduce patient pain and improve peripheral venous access experience during phlebotomy in oncology patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Clin Pathol
August 2024
Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey.
Objectives: Laboratory testing, crucial for medical diagnosis, has 3 phases: preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical. This study set out to demonstrate whether automating tube labeling through artificial intelligence (AI) support enhances efficiency, reduces errors, and improves outpatient phlebotomy services.
Methods: The NESLI tube-labeling robot (Labenko Informatics), which uses AI models for tube selection and handling, was used for the experiments.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!