AI Article Synopsis

  • A post-hoc analysis of the RAINBOW trial investigated the efficacy of ramucirumab and paclitaxel (RAM+PAC) in patients with liver metastasis (LM) versus those without, highlighting that around 40% of advanced gastric cancer patients have LM, which worsens prognosis.
  • In this study involving 665 patients, those with LM experienced earlier disease progression, but RAM+PAC treatment improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for both groups, with better outcomes observed in the LM+ group.
  • Despite similar adverse events across both groups, the analysis found no significant predictive relationship between biomarkers and treatment efficacy, suggesting that RAM

Article Abstract

Purpose: Liver metastasis (LM) is reported in approximately 40% of patients with advanced/metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma; mGEA) and is associated with a worse prognosis. This post-hoc analysis from the RAINBOW trial reported the efficacy, safety, and biomarker outcomes of ramucirumab and paclitaxel combination treatment (RAM+PAC) in patients with (LM+) and without (LM-) LM at baseline.

Materials And Methods: Patients (n=665) were randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to receive either RAM+PAC (LM+: 150, LM-: 180) or placebo and paclitaxel (PL+PAC) (LM+: 138, LM-: 197). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using stratified Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. The correlation of dichotomized biomarkers (VEGF-C, D; VEGFR-1,2) with efficacy in the LM+ versus LM- subgroups was analyzed using the Cox regression model with reported interaction P-values.

Results: The presence of LM was associated with earlier progression than those without LM, particularly in patients receiving PL+PAC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.68). RAM+PAC treatment improved OS and PFS irrespective of LM status but showed greater improvement in LM+ than that in LM- (OS HR, 0.71 [LM+] vs. 0.88 [LM-]; PFS HR, 0.47 [LM+] vs. 0.76 [LM-]). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between patients with and without LM. No predictive relationship was observed between biomarker levels (VEGF-C, D; VEGFR-1,2) and efficacy outcome (OS, PFS) (all interaction P-values >0.05).

Conclusions: RAM provided a significant benefit, irrespective of LM status; however, its effect was numerically stronger in patients with LM. Therefore, RAM+PAC is a clinically meaningful therapeutic option for patients with mGEA and LM.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01170663.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154140PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e15DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients
8
gastric/gastroesophageal junction
8
junction adenocarcinoma
8
liver metastasis
8
lm+ lm-
8
cox regression
8
vegf-c vegfr-12
8
vegfr-12 efficacy
8
irrespective status
8
lm+
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!