Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 177
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 177
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 251
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3125
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This review reports the user experience of symptom checkers, aiming to characterize users studied in the existing literature, identify the aspects of user experience of symptom checkers that have been studied, and offer design suggestions. Our literature search resulted in 31 publications. We found that (1) most symptom checker users are relatively young; (2) eight relevant aspects of user experience have been explored, including motivation, trust, acceptability, satisfaction, accuracy, usability, safety/security, and functionality; (3) future symptom checkers should improve their accuracy, safety, and usability. Although many facets of user experience have been explored, methodological challenges exist and some important aspects of user experience remain understudied. Further research should be conducted to explore users' needs and the context of use. More qualitative and mixed-method studies are needed to understand actual users' experiences in the future.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148318 | PMC |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!