A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A simplified BRADEN scale for the risk of developing pressure injuries. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Pressure injuries (PIs) are a significant issue in healthcare, particularly in ICUs, where they can severely affect patient quality of life and increase care costs despite being largely preventable.
  • The study aimed to create a simplified version of the Braden scale by removing two subjective subscores (Nutrition and Sensory Perception) to improve accuracy in risk assessment for nursing teams.
  • The results indicated that both the original and simplified Braden scales effectively differentiate between patients with and without PIs, with minimal impact on classification performance, thereby facilitating more efficient and objective risk classification in clinical practice.

Article Abstract

Background: Pressure injuries (PIs) are a major problem for healthcare providers, impacting both care costs and patients' quality of life, although they are predominately preventable. These injuries are especially present in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) as a result of the severity of the clinical conditions of patients in this unit.

Aim: To develop a simplified version of the Braden scale by removing two of the most subjective subscores-Nutrition and Sensory Perception-in an attempt to reduce the chance of errors by the nursing team during the application of the scale.

Study Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted on data collected from patients admitted to the ICU of a private Brazilian tertiary hospital. The resulting data consisted of 5194 patients, 6353 hospital admissions, and 6974 ICU stays. The overall prevalence of PI was 1.09%.

Results: The T-test showed that both the Braden and the simplified Braden scores were significantly different between patients with and without PI (p < .001). Patients who developed PIs scored lower than those who did not. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve of the Braden Scale was 74.21% (95% CI: 68.61%-79.8%) and of the simplified scale was 72.54% (95% CI: 66.87%-78.22%). The Positive Predictive Value of the Braden Scale was 3.17% when interpolated at the same sensitivity as the simplified scale (47.37%), which achieved 3.26%.

Conclusions: By removing two of the six subscores of the Braden scale we propose a new tool for identifying patients at risk of developing PI in a more objective and fast way. Our results show that classification performance had little negative impact.

Relevance To Clinical Practice: A simplified, less subjective scale allows for more precise and less time-consuming risk classification.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12923DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

simplified braden
8
braden scale
8
pressure injuries
8
scale risk
4
risk developing
4
developing pressure
4
injuries background
4
background pressure
4
injuries pis
4
pis major
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!