A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The therapeutic benefit of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is a major cause of heart failure, particularly in patients reliant on right ventricular pacing, and upgrading to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may help.
  • A study analyzed 43 patients who upgraded to CRT over 10 years, finding significant improvements in heart function, with average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) rising from 28.7% to 44.3%.
  • The research also indicated that certain medications like ACE inhibitors or ARBs contribute to LVEF improvement, and while complications were low, a small percentage of upgrades required additional procedures.

Article Abstract

Background: Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is an important cause of heart failure in patients with a right ventricular pacing burden. Recent evidence suggests that an upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may confer benefit in PICM.

Objective: To assess the extent and identify predictors of improvement following upgrade to CRT in patients with PICM.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients undergoing CRT upgrade for PICM over the 10-year period of 2011 to 2021 at our center. All patients with PICM who underwent device upgrade from a dual- or single-chamber ventricular pacemaker to CRT were included. PICM was defined as a decrease of ≥10% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), resulting in an LVEF <50% among patients with ≥20% Right ventricular pacing burden without an alternative cause for cardiomyopathy.

Results: LVEF significantly improved from 28.7% preupgrade to 44.3% post-CRT upgrade ( .01). Of 37 patients with severe LV dysfunction, 34 (91.9%) improved to an LVEF >35% and 13 (35.1%) improved to an LVEF >50%. The LV end-diastolic diameter decreased from 5.9 cm preupgrade to 5.4 cm postupgrade ( .01). Using linear regression, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use was associated with significant LVEF improvement (+7.21%, .05). We observed a low rate of complications, and 1 in 4 CRT upgrades required venoplasty (n = 10 of 43, 23.3%).

Conclusion: We provide further evidence for the benefit of CRT upgrade in the management of patients with PICM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134389PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.01.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upgrade cardiac
8
cardiac resynchronization
8
resynchronization therapy
8
pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
8
crt upgrade
8
patients picm
8
upgrade
6
patients
6
crt
6
picm
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!