AI Article Synopsis

  • This meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for treating glioma by reviewing 20 studies involving 2,321 patients.
  • The findings indicated no significant improvement in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) for patients receiving these inhibitors, with median OS around 8.85 months and median PFS about 3.72 months.
  • Adverse events were common, with a 70% incidence rate, and 19% of patients experienced severe side effects (≥ grade 3), although the analysis results were stable and reliable.

Article Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with glioma.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to January 2023 without language restriction. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). The risk of bias was assessed by subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias, including funnel plot, Egger's test, and Begg's test.

Results: A total of 20 studies involving 2,321 patients were included in this meta-analysis. In the analysis of the included phase III clinical trials, the forest plot showed that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors did not improve the OS (HR=1.15, 95% CI: 1.03-1.29, P=0.02, I = 14%) and PFS (HR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.03-1.99, P=0.03, I = 87%). In the single-arm analysis, the forest plot demonstrated that the 6-month OS was 71% (95% CI: 57%-83%, I = 92%), 1-year OS was 43% (95% CI: 33%-54%, I = 93%), and the 2-year OS was 27% (95% CI: 13%-44%, I = 97%). The pooled estimate of the median OS was 8.85 months (95% CI: 7.33-10.36, I = 91%). Furthermore, the result indicated that the 6-month PFS was 28% (95% CI: 18%-40%, I = 95%), 1-year PFS was 15% (95% CI: 8%-23%, I = 92%), and the 18-month PFS was 10% (95% CI: 3%-20%, I = 93%). The pooled estimate of the median PFS was 3.72 months (95% CI: 2.44-5.00, I = 99%). For ORR, the pooled estimate of ORR was 10% (95% CI: 2%-20%, I = 88%). We further analyzed the incidence of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-related AEs, and the pooled incidence of AEs was 70% (95% CI: 58%-81%, I = 94%). The incidence of AEs ≥ grade 3 was 19% (95% CI: 11%-30%, I = 94%). The funnel plot for the median PFS and median OS was symmetric with no significant differences in Egger's test and Begg's test. The sensitivity analysis revealed that our results were stable and reliable.

Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy is relatively safe but could not prolong survival in glioma. More randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our results.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023396057.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10140424PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1168244DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

95%
14
pooled estimate
12
efficacy safety
8
pd-1/pd-l1 inhibitors
8
sensitivity analysis
8
funnel plot
8
egger's test
8
test begg's
8
forest plot
8
estimate median
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!