Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (II): standardized reconstruction phase in 4 steps.

Cir Esp (Engl Ed)

Unidad de Cirugía HBP, Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona, Tarragona, Spain. Electronic address:

Published: October 2023

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2023.04.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

robotic pancreatoduodenectomy
4
pancreatoduodenectomy standardized
4
standardized reconstruction
4
reconstruction phase
4
phase steps
4
robotic
1
standardized
1
reconstruction
1
phase
1
steps
1

Similar Publications

Mesopancreas dissection level 3 for pancreatic head cancer in combined robotic/open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched study.

Surg Endosc

December 2024

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery and Therapeutic and Research Center of Pancreatic Cancer, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, 201 Section 2 Shipai Road, Taipei, 112, Taiwan, ROC.

Background: Mesopancreas dissection (MPD) level 3 in combined robotic/open pancreatoduodenectomy (CR/OPD) is technique-demanding. This study aims to clarify the feasibility and justification of MPD level 3.

Methods: Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted for 208 patients with pancreatic head cancer undergoing CR/OPD with or without MPD level 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Robotic simulation training curricula aim to aid surgeons in attaining robotic operating room proficiency, but the crossover success remains to be examined.

Design: A retrospective cohort study grading robotic biotissue training models and intraoperative anastomotic videos. The curriculum included deliberate practice of inanimate drills of a hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) and gastrojejunostomy (GJ).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is used more commonly, but high-level evidence is still scarce. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the short-term outcomes between RPD and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) using data collected from propensity score-matched (PSM) studies.

Materials And Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases for PSM studies comparing RPD and LPD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for portal annular pancreas: how to do it.

Surg Today

December 2024

Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.

Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is an uncommon anomaly in which the pancreatic parenchyma surrounds the portal or superior mesenteric vein. An adequate operative approach is necessary to prevent clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for PAP. We herein report a case of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for PAP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The use of minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is being increasingly adopted despite the lack of hard evidence to support its utilisation. With recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) with robotic or laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD or LPD), we undertook a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing all 3 approaches to evaluate comparative outcomes.

Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted up to May 2024 and relevant RCTs were identified.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!