The current work was designed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T) versus best supportive care (BSC) for patients with advanced stage or metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (mGC) from a UK perspective. A partitioned survival analysis was undertaken using data from the phase III TAGS trial. A jointly fitted lognormal model was selected for overall survival and individual generalized gamma models were chosen for progression-free survival and time-to-treatment-discontinuation. The primary outcome was the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to investigate uncertainty. Compared with BSC, T/T was associated with a cost per QALY gained of £37,907. T/T provides a cost-effective treatment option for mGC in the UK setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fon-2022-0662DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

metastatic gastroesophageal
8
qaly gained
8
cost-effectiveness analysis
4
analysis trifluridine/tipiracil
4
trifluridine/tipiracil heavily
4
heavily pretreated
4
pretreated metastatic
4
gastroesophageal cancers
4
cancers current
4
current work
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!