Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The advantages of remnant tissue preservation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) remain controversial.
Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that a large amount of remnant tissue, especially if anatomically positioned, would improve patient-reported outcomes and second-look graft appearance after preserved double-bundle ACLR (DB-ACLR).
Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: This retrospective study included 89 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral remnant-preserving DB-ACLR using 2 hamstring tendon autografts. The authors categorized the arthroscopic findings into 3 groups according to the location and volume of the ACL remnant tissue in the femoral notch: (1) anatomical attachment (group AA; n = 34); (2) nonanatomical attachment (group NA; n = 33); and (3) no remnant (group NR; n = 22). Based on second-look arthroscopy, the reconstructed graft was graded as excellent, fair, or poor. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at 2 years after surgery using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Japanese Anterior Cruciate Ligament Questionnaire-25 (JACL-25).
Results: The AA and NA groups had a significantly shorter time from injury to surgery compared with the NR group ( = .0165). Considering the second-look arthroscopic findings, the authors found a significant difference in synovial coverage of the grafts between the 3 groups ( = .0018). There were no significant differences in the overall KOOS and JACL-25 score among the 3 groups; however, the KOOS-Sport and Recreation and KOOS-Quality of Life subscale scores were significantly higher in the AA group compared with the NA and NR groups ( = .0014 and .0039, respectively). The JACL-25 score for middle- to high-speed flexion and extension was significantly better in the AA group versus the NR group ( = .0261).
Conclusion: This study showed that preserving anatomically positioned and adequate remnant tissue during DB-ACLR improved second-look graft appearance and KOOS-Sport and Recreation and KOOS-Quality of Life scores.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10126626 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231162389 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!