Multiplex Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence: A Practical Update for Pathologists.

Our understanding of the biology and management of human disease has undergone a remarkable evolution in recent decades. Improved understanding of the roles of complex immune populations in the tumor microenvironment has advanced our knowledge of antitumor immunity, and immunotherapy has radically improved outcomes for many advanced cancers. Digital pathology has unlocked new possibilities for the assessment and discovery of the tumor microenvironment, such as quantitative and spatial image analysis. Despite these advances, tissue-based evaluations for diagnosis and prognosis continue to rely on traditional practices, such as hematoxylin and eosin staining, supplemented by the assessment of single biomarkers largely using chromogenic immunohistochemistry (IHC). Such approaches are poorly suited to complex quantitative analyses and the simultaneous evaluation of multiple biomarkers. Thus, multiplex staining techniques have significant potential to improve diagnostic practice and immuno-oncology research. The different approaches to achieve multiplexed IHC and immunofluorescence are described in this study. Alternatives to multiplex immunofluorescence/IHC include epitope-based tissue mass spectrometry and digital spatial profiling (DSP), which require specialized platforms not available to most clinical laboratories. Virtual multiplexing, which involves digitally coregistering singleplex IHC stains performed on serial sections, is another alternative to multiplex staining. Regardless of the approach, analysis of multiplexed stains sequentially or simultaneously will benefit from standardized protocols and digital pathology workflows. Although this is a complex and rapidly advancing field, multiplex staining is now technically feasible for most clinical laboratories and may soon be leveraged for routine diagnostic use. This review provides an update on the current state of the art for tissue multiplexing, including the capabilities and limitations of different techniques, with an emphasis on potential relevance to clinical diagnostic practice.