Taking a Deeper Dive Into Malnutrition and Revision Arthroplasty: When Do Nutritionists Get Involved?

Background: Perioperative malnutrition is associated with increased complications and mortality following revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA). Nutritional consultations are useful in characterizing patient nutritional status but are inconsistently utilized post rTJA. We sought: 1) to describe the prevalence of nutritional consultations post rTJA, 2) to determine if septic rTJA patients needed consultations more often, and 3) if a diagnosis of 'malnutrition' from the nutritionist conferred increased readmission rates.

Methods: A retrospective study of 2,697 rTJAs performed in a single institution over a 4-year period was performed. Patient demographics, reasons for rTJA, occurrences of nutritional consultation (indicated if body mass index < 20, malnutrition screening tool score ≥ 2, or poor oral intake postoperatively), specific nutritional diagnosis (according to 2020 Electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology and 90-day readmission rates were recorded and analyzed). Rates of consultations and adjusted logistic regressions were calculated.

Results: There were 501 patients (18.6%) who required nutritional consultations, with 55 (11.0%) of these patients receiving a 'malnutrition' diagnosis. Septic rTJA patients required significantly more nutritional consultations (P < .01) and were significantly more likely to have 'malnutrition' (P = .49). A diagnosis of malnutrition was associated with the highest odds of all-cause readmission (odds ratio (OR) = 3.89, P = .01), which was even higher than undergoing a septic rTJA.

Conclusion: Nutritional consultations occur frequently following rTJA. Patients who receive a diagnosis of 'malnutrition' through consultation are at significantly higher risk for readmission and require close follow-up. Future efforts are needed to further characterize these patients in order to identify as well as optimize them preoperatively.