A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Clinical practice guideline appraisal and algorithm development to identify recommendations related to nursing practice for post-stroke dysphagia. | LitMetric

Aims And Objectives: To assess the methodological quality of current clinical practice guidelines related to post-stroke dysphagia and develop an algorithm using nursing process as a framework for clinical nursing.

Background: Dysphagia is a serious complication of stroke. Yet the recommendations related to nursing in guidelines have not been systematically sorted out, so they are difficult for nurses to use to guide clinical nursing practice.

Design: Systematic review.

Methods: A systematic review of literature was performed using the PRISMA Checklist. A systematic search for relevant guidelines published between 2017 and 2022 was conducted. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument was used to assess methodological quality. Recommendations related to nursing practice from high-quality guidelines were summarised and developed into an algorithm to provide reference for the standardised construction of nursing practice scheme.

Results: 991 records were initially identified from database searches and other sources. Finally, 10 guidelines were included, of which 5 were rated as high quality. A total of 27 recommendations from the 5 highest-scoring guidelines were summarised and used to develop an algorithm.

Conclusions: This study indicated deficiencies and variability in current available guidelines. Based on five high-quality guidelines, we developed an algorithm to facilitate nurses' adherence to guidelines and contribute to evidence-based nursing. In the future, high-quality guidelines, together with large-sample and multi-centre clinical researches are suggested to give more scientific and convincing evidence to nursing of post-stroke dysphagia.

Relevance To Clinical Practice: The findings indicate that nursing process may provide a unified framework for standardised nursing of different diseases. Nursing leaders are recommended to adopt this algorithm in their units. In addition, nursing administrators and educators should promote the application of nursing diagnosis to help nurses foster nursing thinking mode.

Patient Or Public Contribution: No patient or public involvement in this review.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16737DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nursing
14
clinical practice
12
recommendations nursing
12
nursing practice
12
high-quality guidelines
12
guidelines
11
post-stroke dysphagia
8
assess methodological
8
methodological quality
8
nursing process
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!