Purpose: Very few studies have demonstrated the rituximab biosimilarity in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in India. Therefore, we compared the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and immunogenicity of our biosimilar rituximab with the reference rituximab (Ristova, Roche products [India] Pvt. Ltd) in patients with DLBCL in India.
Methods: A phase 3, randomized, assessor-blind, parallel-group, two-arm study was conducted across 28 sites in India. A total of 153 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients were randomized to receive either biosimilar rituximab or reference rituximab. The study drugs were administered at a dose of 375 mg/m by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) at the end of Cycle 6. Secondary end points included: pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety assessment.
Results: The ORR at the end of Cycle 6 was 82.14% in the biosimilar rituximab and 85.71% in the reference rituximab group. The risk difference (90% CIs) was - 3.57 (- 14.80, 7.66). It met the non-inferiority margin of - 20%. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were comparable between the two treatment groups. The incidence rate of immunogenicity was very low and similar in both the treatment groups. The safety profile of both the treatments was comparable with no major difference in terms of nature, frequency and severity of TEAEs.
Conclusion: The study demonstrated the biosimilarity between the biosimilar rituximab and the reference rituximab. Our biosimilar rituximab could add to the cost-effective treatment alternatives for patients with DLBCL in India.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124690 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04530-x | DOI Listing |
Expert Opin Biol Ther
January 2025
Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Introduction: Biosimilars are biologic medications designed to closely replicate the properties of previously approved biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). They offer a cost-effective alternative once the original product's patent has expired.
Areas Covered: In pediatric rheumatology, the use of biosimilars began in 2013 with the launch of the infliximab biosimilar.
Am J Manag Care
December 2024
Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University Harrison College of Pharmacy, 4306D Walker Building, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5506. Email:
Objectives: This study evaluated the uptake and costs of 3 biosimilars among Medicare and Medicaid populations for 2019 to 2022: rituximab-abbs (Truxima), rituximab-pvvr (Ruxience), and rituximab-arrx (Riabni).
Study Design: A retrospective, descriptive study.
Methods: Using the annually aggregated, product-level utilization and cost data of biologic and biosimilar rituximab products from CMS drug spending data, total claims and costs (reimbursement and out of pocket) for all rituximab products were identified and extracted from Medicare Part B, Medicare Part D, and Medicaid.
World J Nephrol
December 2024
Hospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Saint Petersburg 194100, Sankt-Peterburg, Russia.
Background: Juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a severe, life-threatening disease. However, the role of rituximab in managing juvenile SLE remains undefined, although early biological intervention may improve disease outcomes.
Aim: To assess the differences in the outcomes of different types of rituximab administration (early and late).
Arthritis Res Ther
December 2024
Memorial Herman Northwest Hospital, Houston, TX, 77089, USA.
Objectives: To assess immunogenicity and safety in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) transitioning from rituximab [US-licensed rituximab: Reference Product (RP); EU-approved rituximab: Reference Medicinal Product (RMP)] to DRL_RI (proposed rituximab biosimilar), in comparison to those continuing on RP/RMP.
Methods: This double-blind, randomized, Phase 3 study included 140 RA patients having prior exposure to RP/RMP; transitioned to DRL_RI (n = 70) or continued with RP/RMP (n = 70) for two 1000 mg infusions on Days 1 and 15. Assessments included Time-matched Rituximab Concentration (TMRC), anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and ADA titre over 12 weeks, and safety follow-up till 26 weeks.
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis
November 2024
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit of Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!