A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validation and psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale. | LitMetric

Objectives: The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale is a symptom-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients suffering from nasal obstruction. The instrument is designed specifically for patients with septal deviation and for the evaluation of the outcome of septoplasty. The aim of this study was to validate a Swedish version of the NOSE instrument for use in clinical practice and research.

Methods: A Swedish version of the NOSE was tested in a case group consisting of 125 subjects with nasal obstruction (of which 31 underwent septoplasty) and a control group consisting of 65 healthy subjects. Base line data for the case and control groups were used to evaluate face validity, known groups validity, construct validity, internal consistency and factor structure analysis. Fifty participants in both the case groups and control groups were assessed both at baseline and after 2 weeks to evaluate test-retest reliability. The participants who underwent septoplasty were assessed at baseline and after 3-6 months to evaluate responsiveness.

Results: The S-NOSE was found to be reliable, valid, and responsive. Both Cronbach's and McDonald Omega coefficients were >0.7, and the intra class coefficient was 0.942. The S-NOSE scores were significantly correlated with nasal patency VAS in both the case group and the control group ( < .001 and  = .018, respectively). After septoplasty, the mean S-NOSE score were significantly improved ( < .001). Furthermore, the S-NOSE was shown to have excellent and robust psychometric properties.

Conclusion: The S-NOSE can be recommended in both clinical practice and research to evaluate the outcome of septoplasty in Swedish-speaking populations.

Level Of Evidence: NA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10116965PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1036DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nasal obstruction
16
swedish version
12
obstruction symptom
8
symptom evaluation
8
version nose
8
case group
8
group consisting
8
underwent septoplasty
8
control group
8
control groups
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!