A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A forefoot strike pattern during 18° uphill walking leads to greater ankle joint and plantar flexor loading. | LitMetric

Background: The ankle joint is one of the most involved joints in uphill walking. Furthermore, it is well known that toe walking increases the external dorsiflexion moment in the first half of stance during level walking. However, the effects of different foot-strike patterns on plantar flexor muscle forces, ankle joint forces, and other lower limb joint and muscle forces are unknown.

Research Question: Do foot-strike patterns during 18° uphill walking affect lower limb sagittal joint angles and moments, as well as joint contact and muscle forces?

Methods: This study was based on a data subset from previous publications, analysing uphill walking on an 18° ramp at a preset speed of 1.1 m/s in 18 male participants (34 limbs analyzed, 27 ± 5 years). Participants were divided into two groups based on their foot-strike pattern at initial contact: heel (HC) and forefoot (FC). Lower limb sagittal joint angles and moments as well as joint contact and muscle forces were assessed. Differences between the groups were assessed using two-sample t-tests.

Results: FC showed increased soleus and gastrocnemius muscle forces as well as ankle joint forces during loading response and mid stance compared to HC. The soleus muscle force impulse was 51.1% higher in the FC group than in the HC group (p < 0.001). On the other hand, FC had a lower absolute centre of mass vertical displacement and reduced knee and hip joint, as well as iliopsoas and hamstring muscle force impulses.

Significance: In terms of plantar flexor and ankle joint loading, it is advantageous to exhibit a heel strike pattern. The current results can be used to recommend foot-strike patterns for uphill walking, particularly in the presence or prevention of musculoskeletal issues.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.04.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uphill walking
16
ankle joint
16
muscle forces
16
lower limb
12
joint
9
18° uphill
8
plantar flexor
8
foot-strike patterns
8
joint forces
8
limb sagittal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!