Objective: The main objective was to evaluate the anterior flexion force (AFF) and the lateral abduction force (LAF) of patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and to compare the measured force with that in a similar-age control group. The secondary objective was to identify prognostic factors for muscle strength recovery.
Methods: Forty-two shoulders that underwent primary RSA between September 2009 and April 2020 met the inclusion criteria and were called the arthroplasty group (AG). The control group (CG) consisted of 36 patients. The mean AFF and the mean LAF were evaluated with a digital isokinetic traction dynamometer.
Results: The average AFF found in the AG was 15 N, while in the CG, the average AFF was 21 N ( < .001). The average LAF in the AG was 14 N (standard deviation [SD] 8 N), while in the CG the average LAF was of 19 N (SD 6 N) ( = .002). All prognostic factors studied in the AG showed no statistical significance: dominance (AFF 0.697/LAF 0.883), previous rotator cuff repair surgery (AFF 0.786/LAF 0.821), Hamada radiological classification (AFF 0.343/LAF 0.857), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pre-operative evaluation of the quality of the teres minor (AFF 0.131/LAF 0.229), suture of the subscapularis at the end of the arthroplasty procedure (AFF 0.961/LAF 0.325) and postoperative complications (AFF 0.600/LAF 0.960).
Conclusion: The mean AFF was 15 N, and the mean LAF was 14 N. The comparison of AFF and LAF with a CG showed a 25% reduction in muscle strength. It was not possible to demonstrate prognostic factors for muscle strength recovery after RSA.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10107961 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24715492231167111 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Med
January 2025
Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic Zürich, 8008 Zürich, Switzerland.
: Classical reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with a high neck-shaft angle (NSA) of 155° has shown satisfactory outcomes. However, newer RSA designs aim to improve results by modifying the stem design. This study evaluates the 5-year outcomes of a stem design featuring a rectangular metadiaphyseal fixation and a 135° NSA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
January 2025
CHP Saint Grégoire, 6 Boulevard de la Boutière, 35760 Saint-Grégoire, France.
The importance of the subscapularis tendon in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been increasingly emphasized lately. Recent studies have indicated that a repaired subscapularis tendon has better functional outcomes. This study is aimed at comparing the healing rate of repaired subscapularis tendons between onlay and inlay Bony Increased Offset-Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty (BIO-RSA).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
January 2025
Melbourne Shoulder and Elbow Centre, Sandringham, VIC, Australia; Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Sciences Monash Health, Monash University, VIC, Australia.
Background: Acromial stress fractures can occur after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). We performed this study to assess the incidence, risk factors, characteristics, and outcome of acromial stress fractures and reactions after RTSA.
Methods: We determined the incidence of acromial stress fractures and reactions in a cohort of patients who underwent RTSA, and assessed risk factors using a case-control design.
Bioengineering (Basel)
January 2025
Department of Orthopedic Research, Arthrex, 81249 Munich, Germany.
Objective: This study evaluated the effects of bony increased offset (BIO) and metallic augments (MAs) on primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) baseplate stability in cadaveric specimens with variable bone densities.
Methods: Thirty cadaveric specimens were analyzed in an imaging and biomechanical investigation. Computed tomography (CT) scans allowed for preoperative RSA planning and bone density analysis.
J Clin Orthop Trauma
March 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Woodend Hospital, Aberdeen, AB15 6XS, UK.
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has witnessed a significant advancement with the introduction of lateralisation techniques, aiming to enhance shoulder function and implant durability. Traditional medialised designs, following Grammont's principles, have encountered challenges such as scapular notching, reduced rotational strength, and instability. In contrast, lateralisation methods, which reposition the joint center of rotation laterally on the glenoid, humerus, or both, seek to improve deltoid leverage, optimize the rotator cuff muscles' length-tension relationship, and enhance joint stability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!