Background And Objectives: There is no international consensus for management of early-stage cervical cancer (ESCC). This study aimed to retrospectively investigate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with ESCC according to the therapeutic strategy used, surgery alone versus preoperative radiation following by surgery.

Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 1998 to 2015 using the Gynecological Cancer Registry of the Côte d'Or. The inclusion criteria were FIGO 2018 ≤ IB2; squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous type. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test.

Results: One hundred twenty-six patients were included. Median survival was 90 months. There was no significant difference in DFS (HR = 0.91, 95%CI [0.32-2.53], p = 0.858) or in OS between surgery alone versus preoperative radiation following by surgery (HR = 0.97, 95%CI [0.31-2.99], p = 0.961). In the subgroup of patients with stage ≥IB1, there was no significant difference in DFS (HR = 3.26, p = 0.2) or in OS (HR = 3.87, p = 0.2).

Conclusion: Our study did not identify any difference in survival according to the treatment strategy. Preoperative radiation following by surgery can be an alternative to surgery alone for ESCC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172169PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1823DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

preoperative radiation
16
surgery versus
12
versus preoperative
12
therapeutic strategy
8
disease-free survival
8
early-stage cervical
8
cervical cancer
8
difference dfs
8
radiation surgery
8
survival
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!