AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study compared two surgical methods, tibiofibular proximal osteotomy with an absorbable spacer (TPOASI) and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO), in terms of complications and clinical results over a two-year period for patients with knee osteoarthritis.
  • - Both procedures improved pain and functionality post-surgery, with TPOASI showing better short-term results, including a shorter hospital stay and less blood loss and complications compared to OWHTO.
  • - However, after two years, there were no significant differences in overall outcomes (like WOMAC scores) between the two groups, indicating both methods are effective for treating this condition.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to compare the perioperative complications, short-term clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic parameters of tibiofibular proximal osteotomy combined with absorbable spacer insertion (TPOASI) and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) in a two year postoperative time period.

Methods: A total of 160 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence classification grade 3 medial compartmental knee OA were randomized to receive either TPOASI (n = 82) or OWHTO (n = 78). The primary and secondary outcomes were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at each follow-up examination. The primary outcomes were the between-group change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Global score (WOMAC). Secondary measures included visual analog scale (VAS), radiographic parameters, American Knee Society Score (KSS), operation time, blood loss, length of incision, hospital stay, and relevant complications. Postoperative radiographic parameters, including the femorotibial angle (FTA), varus angle (VA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA), were measured to evaluate the correction of varus deformity.

Results: No significant differences were found in the baseline data between the two groups. Both methods improved functional status and pain postoperatively. For primary outcomes of both groups, statistical difference was observed in WOMAC scores at the 6-month follow-up (P < 0.001). For secondary outcomes, no statistical difference was observed between the groups during the 2-year follow-up (P > 0.05). For TPOASI vs. OWHTO, the mean hospital stay (6.6 ± 1.3 days vs. 7.8 ± 2.1 days) was shorter (P < 0.001), and both blood loss (70.56 ± 35.58 vs. 174.00 ± 66.33 mL) and complication rate (3.7% vs. 12.8%) were significantly lower (P < 0.005 for both).

Conclusions: Both approaches showed satisfactory functional outcomes and alleviated pain. However, TPOASI is a simple, feasible method with few complications, and it could be widely used.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05808-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiographic parameters
12
absorbable spacer
8
high tibial
8
tibial osteotomy
8
medial compartmental
8
compartmental knee
8
primary outcomes
8
hospital stay
8
osteotomy
5
outcomes
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!