AI Article Synopsis

  • Vasopressors, particularly norepinephrine (NE), are crucial in treating sepsis, especially when fluid resuscitation isn't effective, and earlier use of these medications may lead to better patient outcomes.* -
  • A study analyzed data from 2,079 ICU patients meeting sepsis-3 criteria and found that early NE administration (within 6 hours of admission) was linked to lower mortality rates but higher chances of requiring mechanical ventilation, with no significant impact on overall hospital stay length.* -
  • The research concludes that initiating NE early in sepsis cases can reduce mortality and ICU stay duration, highlighting the importance of managing fluid volumes effectively before NE administration.*

Article Abstract

Objectives: Vasopressors are a cornerstone in the management of sepsis, marked by distributive shock often unresponsive to fluid resuscitation. Prior research and clinician surveys have suggested that earlier usage of vasopressors corresponds to improved outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective cohort was constructed using patient data contained within the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database. Analytic cohort included a total of 2079 patients meeting sepsis-3 criteria with a ≥2-point rise in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and administered norepinephrine (NE) as first-line vasopressor within 24 hours of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients receiving other vasopressors or missing documented fluid resuscitation information were excluded. Primary end points included mortality, use of invasive mechanical ventilation and length of stay which were analyzed in a multivariate logistic regression model for the primary effect of time from ICU admission to NE administration using covariates.

Results: Time to NE use was defined as either early, using <6 hours from time of ICU admission or late using >6 hours to ≤24 hours. Patients who received early NE had significantly lower adjusted odds of mortality (0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.97, p=0.026), higher adjusted odds of invasive mechanical ventilation (1.48, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.16, p=0.045), no significant difference in hospital length of stay (difference in days 0.6 (95% CI -3.24 to 2.04)) and lower ICU length of stay (difference in days -0.9 (95% CI -1.74 to -0.01)), as compared with the late NE group.

Conclusion: Among patients admitted to the ICU for sepsis, early use of NE was associated with significantly lower odds of mortality but higher odds of mechanical ventilation, and no significant difference in length of hospital stay but less time in the ICU. Furthermore, the volume of fluids received prior to NE use may have a significant impact on optimal NE timing.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV-therapeutic care/management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106031PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2022-001024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mechanical ventilation
12
length stay
12
volume fluids
8
fluids received
8
patients meeting
8
meeting sepsis-3
8
sepsis-3 criteria
8
fluid resuscitation
8
invasive mechanical
8
time icu
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!