Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical success and complication rates of image-guided lumbar puncture (IGLP) and to evaluate for differences in approach employed to help establish the optimum technique.

Methods: A retrospective search of the hospital picture archiving and communications system was performed to identify all IGLPs that had taken place over a 5-year period. Radiology reports and the electronic medical record were examined to identify technical parameters and complications associated with each procedure.

Results: The technical success rate was 96% (219/228). 69.4% ( = 161) had a previously failed bedside attempt. The rate of complications was 0.01% ( = 2). No major complications were observed. There was no difference in the rates of failure (2.4% vs  3.6%, = 0.68) or complications (0.008% vs  0.012%, = 1) between interlaminar and interspinous approaches.

Conclusion: IGLP is a safe procedure with a high rate of technical success. Where a difficult bedside attempt is anticipated, it is reasonable to forego this and proceed directly to IGLP.

Advances In Knowledge:: This paper helps to confirm what is already assumed about a common radiological procedure. This is important as there has been a shift from bedside technique to most lumbar punctures being performed via image guidance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230400PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220143DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

technical success
12
image-guided lumbar
8
lumbar puncture
8
bedside attempt
8
evaluation practice
4
practice image-guided
4
puncture objective
4
objective purpose
4
purpose study
4
study evaluate
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!