Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We compared the intestinal absorption of monomeric taurocholate bound to albumin with the absorption of the free form. In the presence of albumin the apparent uptake coefficient is about three times greater than that in its absence. This result resembles the one reported previously for the liver. In the gut, however, this phenomenon is attributable to the diffusive resistance of an unstirred intervillous fluid layer, whereas in the liver this explanation has been excluded. We conclude that only free taurocholate engages the bile acid transport system in ileal mucosa, whereas in the liver bile acid uptake is driven by albumin-taurocholate complexes, as well as by free taurocholate.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1986.250.5.G648 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!