Objective: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is associated with reduced rates of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated trends in LAA closure, the association of LAA closure with stroke/systemic embolism, and its safety profile in patients with AF who underwent cardiac surgery in California. We further tested for hospital-level variation in concomitant LAA closure.

Methods: Adults who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery with preoperative AF were identified in the 2016 to 2019 Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development databases. Propensity score matching was performed to study risk-adjusted associations of LAA closure with ischemic stroke/systemic embolism. Hospital-level variation was studied using intraclass correlation coefficients.

Results: Among 18,434 patients with AF who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting/valve surgery, 47.7% received LAA closure. Rates of LAA closure increased from 44.4% to 51.4% from 2016 to 2019 ( < .001). In 4652 propensity score-matched patients, LAA closure was associated with reduced incidence of stroke/systemic embolism at discharge (1.6% vs 3.1%;  < .001) and readmission with stroke/systemic embolism at 1 year (2.9% vs 4.5%;  = .004). LAA closure was not associated with acute kidney injury, pulmonary complications, blood transfusion, reoperation, or in-hospital mortality. Approximately 18% of the risk-adjusted variation in LAA use was attributed to the hospital, with median center-level rate of 44.9% (interquartile range, 29.6%-57.4%).

Conclusions: LAA closure was associated with minimal surgical morbidity, and reduced short- and midterm incidence of stroke/systemic embolism. Although the use of LAA closure has increased, substantial variation exists among programs in California, suggesting the need for further standardization of care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091286PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.11.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laa closure
24
left atrial
8
atrial appendage
8
cardiac surgery
8
stroke/systemic embolism
8
patients underwent
8
hospital-level variation
8
underwent coronary
8
coronary artery
8
artery bypass
8

Similar Publications

Current Status of CT Imaging Before Common Transcatheter Interventions for Structural Heart Disease.

Diagnostics (Basel)

January 2025

Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.

Over the past decade, several trials and observational studies have validated the use of minimally invasive cardiac interventions as viable treatment options for various cardiac diseases. Transcatheter techniques for severe aortic valve stenosis have rapidly emerged as alternatives to surgical aortic valve replacement in certain patient populations. Additionally, non-surgical treatment options have expanded for conditions affecting other cardiac valves, such as the mitral valve.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

WATCHMAN versus LACbes® device for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: a single-center, propensity-matched study.

BMC Cardiovasc Disord

January 2025

Department of Cardiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, No. 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.

Background: Different left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) devices have been introduced into the clinical setting. A new dual-seal mechanism LACbes® occluder with isogenous barbs for LAAC has been designed to facilitate easier delivery and improve safety. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of the WATCHMAN with those of the LACbes® device for LAAC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Either dual antiplatelet therapy or oral anticoagulation in combination with aspirin represent recommended treatment regimens following left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). As the majority of patients receiving LAAC have high bleeding risk, less aggressive antithrombotic treatments are needed, such as single antiplatelet therapy.

Objectives: To compare both ischemic and bleeding outcomes in patients receiving single (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after successful LAAC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The main objective of this study was to investigate the optimal post-left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) anticoagulation strategy, focusing on minimizing device-related thrombosis (DRT) and thromboembolism (TE) events without increasing bleeding risk. After successful LAAC, consecutive participants were treated with 45-day anticoagulants (rivaroxaban 15 mg daily, dabigatran 110 mg twice a day, and warfarin). The efficacy endpoints included DRT, TE, and hospital readmissions due to cardiac caused, while safety endpoints encompassed bleeding events, monitored over a 12-month follow-up period.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!