The aim of the study was to investigate the retention behaviour (pull-off force include adhesive remnant index = ARI) as well as translucency of various temporary luting cements and use microstructure elucidation methods to formulate explanatory approaches to their mode of action. The retention force of the temporary luting cements Provicol QM Plus (P+), Provicol QM Aesthetic (Pae), Bifix Temp (BiT), and as a reference a glass ionomer cement Meron (M) with a direct (Structur 3/S3) or an indirect (Structure CAD/SCAD) resin-based composite restauration was investigated after accelerated aging (thermocycling). Additional investigation of the physical properties was performed regarding to translucency and surface free energy. The microstructure was evaluated by X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry and micro X-ray computed tomography. All tested temporary luting cements showed different pull-off forces in the range between 3.0 and 16.8 N in combination with S3 or SCAD after thermocycling. Only BiT with S3 showed pull-off forces of 129.2 N and complete retention on the restoration (ARI = 0), which was significant (p < .001) to all other samples. High translucency (BiT > Pae > M > P+) was observed for materials with lower crystalline content and low residual mass (usally resulting from higher organic content). M showed the highest surface free energy with a predominantly polar fraction, while BiT had a predominantly dispersive fraction. The highest porosity was observed in the coronal region of the restoration. The results suggest that translucency of temporary luting cements can be increased with higher organic and lower cryristall content. All combinations of cements and temporary restorations (direct/indirect; with the exception of BiT/S3) showed pull-off forces below 17 N (equivalent to a weight force of ∼1.7 kg), which allows manual detachment of the restoration by the dentist.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105781 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Surface characteristics of resin composite cores and bond strength to CAD/CAM resin matrix glass-ceramic restorations after different treatment protocols.
Odontology
December 2024
Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Av. Pará, 1720, Bloco 4L, Anexo A, sala 4LA-42, Campus Umuarama, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, 38405-320, Brazil.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of various mechanical surface treatments on the surface roughness and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of aged composite resin cores bonded to CAD/CAM restorations. Composite resin specimens (Filtek Z350 XT, 3M-ESPE/Solventum) were thermally aged and subsequently divided into four groups (n = 36) according to surface treatments: UI-cleaning with ultrasonic diamond tip; AO-sandblasting with 50 µm AlO; DB-cleaning with diamond burs; and CG-positive control group, without aging or surface treatment. Surface roughness was assessed using a profilometer and interferometer, with measurements taken on both sides of each specimen (n = 12).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArticle Synopsis
- The study evaluated the effectiveness of various cements for securing implant restorations, including a temporary zinc-oxide cement, a resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and a resin-based, eugenol-free cement.
- Results showed that the resin-modified glass ionomer cement had the highest retention forces, followed by the resin-based cement, with the zinc-oxide cement having the lowest retention.
- While all cements offered adequate retention, the resin-based cement required more effort for removal compared to the other two, indicating potential challenges in future procedures.
Influence of the Composition of Provisional Luting Materials on the Bond Strength of Temporary Single-Tooth Crowns on Titanium Abutments.
Materials (Basel)
August 2024
Center of Dentistry, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Ulm University Hospital, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
In addition to zinc oxide-based cements, resin-based materials are also available for temporary cementation. The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the influence of the different material compositions on temporary bonds. In nine test series (n = 30), temporary bis-acrylate single-tooth crowns were bonded onto prefabricated titanium abutments with nine different temporary luting materials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEffect of cement type, luting protocol, and ceramic abutment material on the shade of cemented titanium-based lithium disilicate crowns and surrounding peri-implant soft tissue: a spectrophotometric analysis.
J Adv Prosthodont
August 2024
Department of Postgraduate Education, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Purpose: The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of cement, bonding pretreatment, and ceramic abutment material on the overall color results of CAD-CAM ceramic crowns bonded to titanium-based hybrid abutments.
Materials And Methods: For single implant restoration of a maxillary lateral incisor a total of 51 CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic lithium disilicate crowns were fabricated and subsequently bonded onto 24 lithium disilicate Ti-base abutments, 24 zirconia Ti-base abutments and 3 resin abutment replicas as a control group. The 48 copings were cemented with three definitive and one provisional cement on both grit-blasted and non-blasted Ti-bases.
Influence of provisional cementation on the stability of adhesively bonded resin-based composite crowns.
Am J Dent
August 2024
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, UKR University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Purpose: To investigate the influence of temporary cementation and subsequent bonding on the durability during in-vitro aging-simulation and fracture force of resin-based composite crowns.
Methods: Identical molar crowns (n=48, n=8 per group) were milled from resin-based composites and temporarily cemented and finally bonded to human molars. To simulate temporary application, crowns were cemented either with zinc-oxide-eugenol-cement (Tempbond) or with eugenol free zinc-oxide-cement (Tempbond NE).
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!