Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To compare standard breath-hold (BH) cine imaging to a radial pseudo-golden-angle free-breathing (FB) technique in congenital heart disease (CHD).
Methods: In this prospective study, short-axis and 4-chamber BH and FB cardiac MRI sequences of 25 participants with CHD acquired at 1.5 Tesla, were quantitatively compared regarding ventricular volumes, function, interventricular septum thickness (IVSD), apparent signal to noise ratio (aSNR), and estimated contrast to noise ratio (eCNR). For qualitative comparison, three image quality criteria (contrast, endocardial edge definition, and artefacts) were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (5: excellent, 1: non-diagnostic). Paired t-Test was used for group comparisons, Bland-Altman analysis for agreement between techniques. Inter-reader agreement was compared using intraclass correlation coefficient.
Results: IVSD (BH 7.4 ± 2.1 mm vs FB 7.4 ± 1.9 mm, p =.71), biventricular ejection fraction (left ventricle [LV]: 56.4 ± 10.8% vs 56.1 ± 9.3%, p =.83; right ventricle [RV]: 49.5 ± 8.6% vs 49.7 ± 10.1%, p =.83), and biventricular end diastolic volume (LV: 176.3 ± 63.9 ml vs 173.9 ± 64.9 ml, p =.90; RV: 185.4 ± 63.8 ml vs 189.6 ± 66.6 ml, p =.34) were comparable. Mean measurement time for FB short-axis sequences was 8.1 ± 1.3 compared to 4.4 ± 1.3 min for BH (p <.001). Subjective image quality between sequences was deemed comparable, (4.6 ± 0.6 vs 4.5 ± 0.6, p =.26, for 4-chamber views) with a significant difference regarding short-axis views (4.9 ± 0.3 vs 4.5 ± 0.6, p =.008). aSNR was similar (BH 25.8 ± 11.2 vs FB 22.2 ± 9.5, p =.24), while eCNR was higher for BH (89.1 ± 36.1 vs 68.5 ± 32.1, p =.03).
Conclusion: FB sequences yielded comparable results to BH regarding image quality, biventricular volumetry, and function, though measurement times were longer. The FB sequence described might be clinically valuable when BHs are insufficiently performed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110831 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!