: This study aimed to determine the optimal combination of biomarkers that can predict epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and compare the combination with the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) or Copenhagen index (CPH-I). : Data from 66 patients with EOC and 599 patients with benign ovarian masses who underwent definitive tissue diagnosis of adnexal masses between January 2017 and March 2021 were analyzed. The Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test was used for between-group comparisons of medians. Logistic regression was used to establish an EOC predictor model. Area under the curve (AUC) comparisons between models were performed using the Delong nonparametric approach. : The median age of the patients was 43 years. Twenty-nine (43.9%) patients had early-stage disease (stages I-II) and 37 (56.1%) patients had advanced-stage disease (stages III-IV). The median age, body mass index, white blood cell count, hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR), platelet count, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, serum albumin level, cancer antigen 125, human epididymal secretory protein 4 (HE4), ROMA, and CPH-I were significantly different between the stage I-IV EOC and benign ovarian mass groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that HE4, HRR, and computed tomography (CT) imaging were significant predictors of both stages I-IV and I-II EOC. Using these covariates, an interim model (IM) (consisting of HE4 and HRR) and a full model (FM) (consisting of HE4, HRR, and CT imaging) were constructed. When predicting stage I-IV EOC, the AUC of IM was comparable to that of ROMA or CPH-I, whereas the AUC of FM outperformed ROMA or CPH-I. In predicting stage I-II EOC, the AUC of IM was comparable to that of CPH-I but higher than that of ROMA, and the AUC of FM outperformed ROMA or CPH-I. : FM outperformed ROMA or CPH-I in predicting stage I-IV EOC and stage I-II EOC. Therefore, FM could be a promising model for improving preoperative prediction of EOC at an early stage. However, further prospective studies are required to validate these results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088533PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.81174DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

roma cph-i
20
stage i-iv
12
i-iv eoc
12
he4 hrr
12
i-ii eoc
12
predicting stage
12
outperformed roma
12
eoc
10
hemoglobin-to-red cell
8
cell distribution
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • - This study evaluated the effectiveness of three diagnostic tools—Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), Copenhagen Index (CPH-I), and Ovarian Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS)—for predicting ovarian cancer in patients with ovarian tumors.
  • - Conducted on 462 patients between May 2020 and December 2022, the research found that O-RADS combined with cancer markers like CA125 provided the most accurate predictions, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity.
  • - The results indicated that while all models showed good predictive values, the combination of O-RADS with CA125 yielded the highest predictive accuracy for ovarian cancer detection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) and Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) in their ability to distinguish epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and malignant ovarian tumors (MLOT) from benign ovarian tumors (BeOT) in Japanese women.

Methods: Patients with pathologically diagnosed ovarian tumors were included in this study. The study validated the diagnostic performance of ROMA and CPH-I.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: This study aimed to determine the optimal combination of biomarkers that can predict epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and compare the combination with the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) or Copenhagen index (CPH-I). : Data from 66 patients with EOC and 599 patients with benign ovarian masses who underwent definitive tissue diagnosis of adnexal masses between January 2017 and March 2021 were analyzed. The Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test was used for between-group comparisons of medians.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We aimed to analyze the benign and malignant identification efficiency of CA125, HE4, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA), Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) in ovarian neoplasms and establish a nomogram to improve the preoperative evaluation value of ovarian neoplasms.

Methods: A total of 3,042 patients with ovarian neoplasms were retrospectively classified according to postoperative pathological diagnosis [benign,  = 2389; epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC),  = 653]. The patients were randomly divided into training and test cohorts at a ratio of 7:3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study aimed to assess how well CA125, HE4, ROMA, and CPH-I can differentiate primary ovarian cancer from borderline and benign ovarian tumors while finding optimal cutoff values for each marker.
  • The research included 684 patients and analyzed pre-surgery marker levels, revealing that all tested markers were significantly higher in ovarian cancer cases compared to borderline and benign tumors.
  • Results showed ROMA and CPH-I were better at identifying ovarian cancer than individual markers, particularly HE4, with CA125 being more effective for postmenopausal women.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!