Background: Dexamethasone use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 significantly reduces mortality; however, it commonly results in hyperglycemia. Optimal treatment of dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia is not well established.
Objective: The study purpose was to assess the difference in blood glucose (BG) control between insulin glargine, neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin, and insulin glargine plus NPH insulin for dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and COVID-19 infection.
Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in adult inpatients with T2DM and COVID-19 infection who received 6 mg of dexamethasone once daily and insulin during the 5-day study period. The primary outcome was the difference in mean point-of-care (POC) BG levels between study insulins. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, length of stay, and the percent difference between the mean daily inpatient and home basal insulin doses (for patients who were receiving basal insulin prior to admission in the insulin glargine and insulin glargine and NPH insulin groups only).
Results: Ninety-six patients were included in the analysis (67 insulin glargine, 10 NPH insulin, and 19 insulin glargine plus NPH insulin). The difference in mean POC BG level was not different among groups (254 ± 60 mg/dL vs 234 ± 39 mg/dL vs 250 ± 51 mg/dL, respectively; = 0.548). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: No difference in the mean POC BG level was observed. Dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia was poorly controlled in patients with T2DM and COVID-19 infection.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982395 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/87551225231156329 | DOI Listing |
Indian J Crit Care Med
January 2025
Department of Anaesthesia, ICU and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Aim And Background: Hyperglycemia is a serious condition and associated with an increased risk of complications and mortality in both critically ill and non-critically ill people. Improvement in the glycemic level reduces the length of hospital stay, systemic infections and short- and long-term mortality. The aim was to test the effectiveness of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine and regular insulin in controlling blood sugar in patients with critical hyperglycemia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
December 2024
Emergency Department, Bahria International Hospital, Rawalpindi, PAK.
This case report presents a rare instance of a 28-year-old female patient with insulin-induced abdominal lipodystrophy, who presented to the emergency department with symptoms of an anxiety attack triggered by body image distress. She was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of eight years. For the past 10 years, she has been using insulin glargine and insulin lispro, injecting roughly five times per day.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiabetes Obes Metab
January 2025
Medical Care Center Endocrinology and Diabetology, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Aims: This study assessed efficacy and safety of the fixed ratio combination iGlarLixi 100/33 (insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide 33 μg/mL) in people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D) in daily clinical practice.
Materials And Methods: This non-interventional, multicentre, prospective, single-arm 24-week study documented PwT2D with an HbA1c of 7.5%-10.
Cureus
November 2024
Department of Pharmacology, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND.
Diabetes mellitus represents a significant and growing global health challenge, with its prevalence steadily increasing. Insulin therapy remains a cornerstone of diabetes management. Since its discovery in 1921, insulin has undergone substantial advancements, evolving from crude animal extracts to highly refined recombinant formulations and biosimilars.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAAPS J
December 2024
Laboratory of Immunology, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality Research Division-IV, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Characterizing and mitigating factors that impact product immunogenicity can aid in risk assessment and/or managing risk following manufacturing changes. For follow-on products that have the same indication, patient population, and active product ingredient, the residual immunogenicity risk resides predominantly on differences in product and process related impurities. Characterizing differences in innate immune modulating impurities (IIRMI), which could act as adjuvants by activating local antigen presenting cells (APCs), can inform the immunogenicity risk assessment potentially reducing the need for clinical trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!